Not even afraid.
This is what the oppositions retort to the threat agitated by Emmanuel Macron to dissolve the National Assembly in the event of the adoption of a motion of censure.
After the “
Chiche!
" by Marine Le Pen and the provocative response of Jean-Luc Mélenchon - "
It is especially for the macronists that it is a threat
" - it is the turn of the president of the deputies Les Républicains, Olivier Marleix, not to be intimidated.
However, he knows he is particularly targeted, since it is on the votes of his group that the President of the Republic counts the most.
A return to the campaign for this party which suffered during the presidential election could also make it lose a few feathers, when it has only 62 deputies.
“
It is a declaration of defiance towards the entire Assembly
”, thus declared the deputy for Eure-et-Loir, in the columns of Le
Parisien,
Friday, September 30.
“
In the event of dissolution, the president would no longer have many En Marche deputies.
He does not seem to be aware of the atmosphere in the country...
", he said, calling on the Head of State to "
first respect the National Assembly given to him by the French and let her work
.
Read alsoRetirements: Republicans facing the political puzzle of a reform deemed necessary
Like the other opponents, Olivier Marleix was quick to place the responsibility for a possible failure in the Assembly in the hands of Emmanuel Macron.
“
The one who would be at fault, in the event of dissolution, it would be him, because he would not have been to organize the dialogue
”, he launched.
Assuring that “
his responsibility is not ranting in front of friends in the gilded salons of the Elysée, it is to make the public authorities work
”.
Before adding, with irony: “
A National Assembly which does not have a majority, I understand that it hurts his ego but it is the French who wanted it.
»
While a new phase of “consultations” must begin concerning pension reform, the leader of the elected LR calls for “
a project
”.
According to him, “
the art of reform is all at once a vision, a will, a method and respect.
So far, almost everything is missing.
The consultation remains in his eyes a "progress", because "
there has never been a pension reform made without real negotiation
".
