The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

"Unreasonable": Summit paper shows hard fronts - is there a risk of a week-long relief stalemate?

2022-10-05T09:32:36.195Z


"Unreasonable": Summit paper shows hard fronts - is there a risk of a week-long relief stalemate? Created: 10/05/2022 11:22 am By: Andreas Schmid Olaf Scholz at the federal-state summit with SPD leader Stephan Weil (SPD, left) and NRW's Hendrik Wüst (CDU). © Bernd von Jutrczenka/dpa The SPD sees "huge progress" after the energy summit, in fact the federal-state meeting does not bring any concr


"Unreasonable": Summit paper shows hard fronts - is there a risk of a week-long relief stalemate?

Created: 10/05/2022 11:22 am

By: Andreas Schmid

Olaf Scholz at the federal-state summit with SPD leader Stephan Weil (SPD, left) and NRW's Hendrik Wüst (CDU).

© Bernd von Jutrczenka/dpa

The SPD sees "huge progress" after the energy summit, in fact the federal-state meeting does not bring any concrete relief - and also leaves many questions unanswered in the decision.

Berlin - Chancellor Olaf Scholz (SPD) promised at the end of September a "double boom" to help the population and the economy with the high energy prices.

A "defense shield" of 200 billion euros should fix it.

But there is still a problem with the concrete political design.

The country is waiting for the proposals for the umbrella.

And the federal-state meeting on Tuesday will not bring any concrete resolutions on the older relief package either.

Relief: price brakes, housing benefit, 9-euro ticket - dispute with the federal and state governments

The federal and state governments are certain that

people should be relieved.

"Citizens and companies should be relieved of the increased energy costs in a targeted manner," says the resolution.

How

, however, remains unclear in many cases.

There are already some suggestions.

In the case of the gas price brake, the assessment of the “Gas and Heat Expert Commission” is still missing.

It should come just as "promptly" as a draft law to introduce an electricity price brake.

Elsewhere, the federal and state governments are arguing about financing: for example, refugee costs or housing benefit, which is to be increased by 190 euros a month and paid out to more than 1.4 million households.

So far, the federal and state governments have shared the costs.

But: “The heads of government of the federal states consider it necessary for the federal government to assume the full cost of housing benefit in the future.”

There is the same dispute with the successor model of the 9-euro ticket.

In principle, it should come, but here too: disagreement, or as the resolution says: "There are different ideas at the federal and state levels about the specific path and the respective financial responsibility." The transport ministers should "come to a conclusion promptly".

discharge

Federal-state plan

problem

gas price brake

agreement in principle

Unclear design

Electricity price brake

agreement in principle

Unclear design

housing benefit

More money for more households

financing

9 euro ticket

Successor

financing

Coverage of refugee costs

End conversations "promptly".

financing

The only clear point: the federal government will take over 240 to 250 billion euros of the 295 billion package (three relief packages and gas price brake) itself.

No results at relief summit: Merz sees "evening of missed opportunities"

Scholz understood the talks on Tuesday evening as "constructive".

There are "still discussions about how this can be shouldered in detail, which have not yet been concluded between the federal and state governments," said the Chancellor.

However, he has “the impression that we are on a very constructive path”.

An impression that the Union does not share at all.

also read

Russian military train towards Ukraine raises nuclear fears – report on secret NATO warning

"Closer to dangerous line": Putin diplomat warns gloomy after US announcement on Ukraine delivery

North Rhine-Westphalia's CDU Prime Minister Hendrik Wüst recognized "hardly any willingness to compromise" at the federal level.

Hesse-Bouffier's successor Boris Rhein (CDU) criticized the results as "disappointment".

Union parliamentary group leader Friedrich Merz saw "an evening of missed opportunities that leaves the citizens unsettled".

Saxony's Prime Minister Michael Kretschmer was particularly disappointed.

The CDU politician accused Scholz of playing for time.

In a protocol statement of the decision paper, Saxony called for "clarity", "quick decisions" and "easily implementable solutions that take effect quickly".

In view of the current situation on the energy and raw materials markets with significantly increased prices, the Free State of Saxony does not consider it reasonable to wait any longer with concrete relief measures.

Saxony's statement on the minutes of the federal-state meeting on October 4th

Prime Ministers from the ranks of the SPD, on the other hand, emphasized progress and unity.

Lower Saxony's social-democratic head of government, Stephan Weil, who is facing a state election on Sunday, spoke of "sensible" consultations, party friend Malu Dreyer from Rhineland-Palatinate of "huge progress".

Federal-state round: Next relief summit on October 27th

Much remains vague during the deliberations.

The only thing that seems clear is that the struggle for relief between the federal and state governments is likely to last for weeks.

The victims are the people in the country affected by the energy crisis.

According to their decision paper, Scholz and the federal states want to meet again "as soon as the details of the effect of the energy price brakes" on electricity and gas "are foreseeable and the tax estimate is available".

The tax estimate is scheduled to be announced on October 27.

(as)

Source: merkur

All news articles on 2022-10-05

You may like

Life/Entertain 2024-04-01T17:19:12.181Z
News/Politics 2024-02-23T04:51:49.876Z

Trends 24h

News/Politics 2024-04-17T18:08:17.125Z

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.