Bring back Bibi: After a slight respite, Netanyahu returned to the path of lies, incitement and incitement

Immediately after the decision to disqualify Shikli from running on the Likud list, the chairman of the opposition gave a speech full of extremely rude lies and his media eunuchs attacked the chairman of the election committee with all their might.

Netanyahu, for his own reasons, decided to return and attack the judicial system, and the demon on duty is Judge Yitzhak Amit

Welcome read

06/10/2022

Thursday, October 6, 2022, 11:42 a.m. Updated: 5:05 p.m.

• Share on Facebook

• Share on WhatsApp

• Share on Twitter

• Share by email

• Share in general

• Comments

  Comments

On video: Netanyahu ran after feeling sick on Yom Kippur.

October 6, 2022 (Netanyahu's PR)

The article written here last week has become outdated in record time.

In my opinion, this is a journalistic record.

On Thursday morning, I wrote about Binyamin Netanyahu's two-mandate strategy - he is not an instigator, the Moslems, the Krayim and the Distals are in the freezer, and the poisoned Ben Yehudaim are already independent in the field spreading the plots of Nazi xenophobia.

A few hours later, the article became irrelevant.

Netanyahu spoke to Modiin, armed with his best inflammatory rhetoric of old, shouting slogans and spreading lies like in the good old days.

Netanyahu is a very thoughtful person, so it's hard to believe that he "got the Bibi".

He also made sure to spread the bulk of his speech on Twitter.

For his reasons, he decided to return, at least for the time being, to the way he has been used to in recent years - the way of incitement and incitement, and who knows, maybe soon Amsalem will come out of the freezer.

we missed

The change happened immediately after the decision of the chairman of the Central Elections Committee, Judge Yitzhak Amit, to disqualify Amichai Shikli's participation in the Likud list. As you may recall, the Knesset committee declared Shikli to be withdrawing from the "Right" faction. The main meaning of the decision was that if Shikli did not resign from the Knesset "soon until the date of his retirement" as the law states, he will not be able to run for the next Knesset on one of the lists serving in the current Knesset (but only, if he wishes, on a new list). Shikli resigned from the Knesset only 80 days after he was announced as a retiring Knesset member, after actually voting several times in dramatic votes as an opposition member For all purposes.

His thought that he could still run on the Likud list was based on the decision of the district court in his case.

Shikli appealed to the district court only 49 days after the decision of the Knesset committee.

At the hearing in the district court, Kelly reached a compromise with the Knesset - he would resign within four days, and then he could run in the next Knesset on any list he wanted.

The composition of the district court gave its blessing to the agreements: "We believe that under the circumstances of the matter this is a proper position that is consistent with the law and the facts of the case."

Shikli relied on this legally invalid blessing.

"He got the Bibi" (Photo: Reuven Castro)

Yanon Magal led the force against Judge Amit with a bunch of tweets that were fired in seconds: "When they said that the High Court is a branch of Meretz, they meant Judge Yitzhak Amit"

Not this one either, Shikli ignored the legal correspondence two days later between the Knesset's legal counsel and the courthouse.

The legal advisor of the Knesset, realizing the complication that could arise, turned to the court to amend the protocol as follows: "I would like to clarify that the position of the legal advisor of the Knesset does not bind the Central Elections Committee of the Knesset, which may discuss this issue. It should be noted that, as a general rule, we are not a party to the proceedings before the chairman of the election committee." The district court did not order the correction of the minutes, but confirmed "that things in the spirit of the aforementioned request were indeed said in the hearing." This warning light was enough for Shiki to understand that it was really, really, not certain that he would be able to run in the elections The closest ones on the Likud list.

I am not currently going into the analysis of Judge Amit's decision.

Obviously, the main discussion of the appeal today (Thursday) will deal with the question of the authority of the chairman of the election committee to decide on this issue. What is absolutely clear is that Amit's position, whether justified or mistaken, is very well reasoned. On 37 pages, he explains why he rejects the attempt to disqualify Idit Silman from the Likud list, and why he does reject Shikli's candidacy. If, at the end of these reasons, Amit's decision had been the opposite regarding Shikli, meaning that he approves his run in Likud, everything would have been wonderful and the judge would have been embraced by Netanyahu's supporters, just as He was awarded by the three judges who only recently (justifiably) disqualified their former colleagues, Judge Mani Mazuz, as the chairman of the advisory committee for the appointment of senior officials.

The thing was that Amit, alas for us, ruled against the wishes of Netanyahu's supporters, and therefore immediately, in a moment, all the destroyers were allowed and Netanyahu's media eunuchs began to attack with full vigor.

Yanon Magal led the charge with a bunch of tweets fired within seconds of each other.

At 20:29 he tweeted: "When they said that the High Court is a branch of Meretz, they meant Judge Yitzhak Amit." A few seconds later he tweeted: "Judge Yitzhak Amit Shalom, this won't help you, we will win (as long as you don't invalidate the results)." Only four minutes passed, until he tweeted: "By the way, on the eve of the holiday, Judge Yitzhak Amit ordered the Foreign Ministry Workers' Committee to break a strike and move polling stations to consulates around the world.

It is not clear by what authority." 12 minutes passed and Magal tweeted again: "By the way, Judge Yitzhak Amit is also the one who is supposed to decide on Yesh Atid's lawsuit against Channel 14. Don't hold your breath, this is a political activist."

More in Walla!

MK Distel Atbarian on the balcony incident: "Likud has a disease of leaks"

To the full article

His disqualification led to attacks against the fellow judge.

Shikli (Photo: Reuven Castro)

Netanyahu decided for political reasons not to participate in the vote against Balad, after another party did request its disqualification

At this point he had to stop the flow of tweets because the "Patriots" program had just aired on his presentation, where you would not be surprised if the case of Judge Amit was at the center of the conversation of all the panel members (all of whom of course were of the same opinion).

Immediately after the end of the program, Magal continued to tweet against the judge.

Voices of outrage were also heard that evening from Magal's colleagues from Channel 14, Gali Israel, as well as from other media outlets.

The outrage was heard, the target was marked - Judge Yitzhak Amit is the new demon.

It was probably no accident.

That evening Netanyahu went back to being Bibi.

In the same speech he gave to intelligence, Netanyahu bombarded with incitement and particularly rude lies: "The whole goal is to overthrow the right-wing government before there are even elections against the will of the people."

Leave the incitement against a Supreme Court judge, think for a moment about the logic.

Shackley?

Because of him will someone apply, or not apply, a sick note?

Who does not.

And then came the first lie: "They disqualify Shikli, but leave Michal Shir."

A song container?

Michal Shir is indeed a member of the Knesset who is dizzying - she started in Likud, moved with Sa'ar to a new hope, and now she is in Bish Atid.

But what does this have to do with us?

She did not move from bloc to bloc during the term, but only after the dissolution of the Knesset, no one asked to declare her retired, and especially no one asked the election committee to disqualify her.

So how exactly does Netanyahu expect Amit to disqualify her.

What does it mean: "Dismiss Shikli, but keep Michal Shir"?

Who left Shir?

Yitzhak Amit?

Someone else we don't know?

Well, it's simple,

Moving on, to the next lie: "They dismiss Shikli," Netanyahu continues, "and leave Ayman Odeh who says that Nasrallah is a model and an example and Ahmed Tibi who says that Hamas is not a terrorist organization."

It's amazing that Netanyahu doesn't even try to craft the lie.

After all, no party, including not the Likud party, asked for the disqualification of Ayman Odeh, Ahmed Tibi and their parties, so how can they be disqualified?

And that leads us to the climax, the lie of lies.

After all, Netanyahu, shame on you, not only did not ask to disqualify the joint party, he did not even vote in favor of disqualifying the extreme Balad party from the joint. Netanyahu, shame on you, decided for his own political reasons not to participate in this vote, after another party actually requested the disqualification of Bel "D.

Amit ruled against the wishes of Netanyahu's supporters, so all the destroyers were allowed and his media eunuchs began to attack (Photo: Reuven Castro)

Now look how this embarrassing decision of Netanyahu's fits in upside down with his speech of incitement and lies: "Balad is dismissed, but Ahmed Tibi and Ayman Odeh are left, because the whole goal is an addictive game whose goal is to overthrow the right and leave the left." This sentence He really is unbelievable. It's hard to decide where to start. So let's start with the fact that Judge Amit did not participate in the vote on the disqualification of Balad at all.

The election committee consists of a representative for each party in the Knesset, and is headed by a Supreme Court judge who also has a vote, of course.

Since Judge Mishal Cheshin's tenure as chairman of the election committee, no chairman of the election committee has participated in votes on the disqualification of parties, and Amit has not deviated from this custom.

In the case of Shikli, the decision was made by the chairman of the committee and not by the committee itself (among other things, the discussion will turn to this today).

Netanyahu "confused" his listeners so that they would think that Amit's hand was in the first terrible crime - the disqualification of Balad, and in the second crime: leaving Odeh and Tibi, this while Netanyahu and Amit are the only ones who influenced, or could have influenced, one or another decision regarding the two parties These are Netanyahu and not Amit. Finally, what does "dismiss Balad to keep Odeh and Tibi" mean?

What is this squeamish anyway?

What is the relationship between one and the other?

Why is it seemingly impossible to disqualify both?

Is there an allocation for disqualifications?

In conclusion, Netanyahu did not ask for Tibi's disqualification, and again, he did not vote in favor of Balad's disqualification, but that does not prevent him from directing the crowd angry at the Arab parties towards the bespectacled judge from the Supreme Court - attack him, he is the evil one, he is bringing the Arabs on us, and on the other hand Disqualifies Shikli. Notice how he concluded this despicable mask of lies: "Now I want to ask you a question, I'm addressing it to the head of the committee, why play?

Let's do it from the pop-up, disqualify the Likud, that's what you need, disqualify the Likud and Chalas." Here you get the bottom line.

Why did Netanyahu decide to return to the policy of incitement and incitement?

After all, until today she has not brought him more than 59 mandates?

Apparently, such a campaign can at most stop the spillover from the Likud to Ben Gabir.

I don't have an intelligent answer to this question, maybe it's stronger than him, maybe he's too subject to negative influences from home, and maybe, what didn't work for him in four election campaigns will work for him in the fifth.

On the other hand, the return of the inciting Netanyahu may once again bring all the Balfour and Ghesher protesters out into the field, which politically may be even worse for him than the terrible and terrible disqualification of Amichai Shikli.

• 2022 election

Tags

• Benjamin Netanyahu

• Amichai Shikli

• The Central Election Committee

• 2022 election