The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Former police officer sentenced to 4 years in prison for forcing his son to watch porn and masturbating

2022-10-06T06:15:11.394Z


The former police officer was involved in playing pornography to his son, who was reading Xiaowu. Not only did he masturbate in front of his son, but he also asked him to masturbate with him. He also involved in live broadcasting his relationship with his wife to his son, and asked his son the next day, "I am looking for Wanxiong or not.


The former police officer was involved in playing pornography to his son, who was reading Xiaowu. Not only did he masturbate in front of his son, but he also asked him to masturbate with him.

He was also involved in live-streaming his relationship with his wife to his son. The next day, he asked his son, "Am I looking for Wanxiong or Xiongwu?" The former police officer was convicted by a jury of committing indecent acts against a 16-year-old child and inciting a child under the age of 16. Convicted of 4 counts of gross indecency.

The defendant's lawyer pleaded that this case is different from other similar cases. The defendant did not take the victim as the object of lust, but just made a foolish act.

When Judge Li Yunteng sentencing in the High Court today (6th), he directly rebuked the defendant, but he was willing to degenerate.

Sentenced to 4 years in prison.


The 47-year-old defendant served as a police officer from 1998 to 2019.

The jury earlier convicted the defendant of two counts of indecent acts against a 16-year-old child and two counts of inciting a child under the age of 16 to commit aggravated indecency, between 2016 and December 2018, when the defendant's son X was about 10 At the age of 12, when X was reading Primary Five, the defendant wanted X to watch pornography and force X to masturbate together with strips.

Pleading and ignoring X as the object of lust

The defense pleaded that the case was a tragedy and that the defendant had acted extremely stupidly.

He loves his son X, but lost his family because of this case.

The lawyer also pointed out that this case is different from general sexual crimes. The defendant does not regard X as the object of sexual gratification. He did not commit the crime for sexual gratification, nor is it the most serious case of its kind, and the defendant's identity as a police officer does not affect the sentence in this case. .

The lawyer also pointed out that although the report of the victim X stated that although X has post-traumatic sequelae, his life has returned to normal.

With the support of his family, X performed well in reading and other aspects.

X's previous testimony made him reminisce about the incident and felt uneasy, but X also overcame it.

X can't bear to hear the defendant's voice again

However, the judge quoted multiple reports when sentencing. Among them, X's trauma report stated that he could not stand the defendant's manipulation of him at the end of 2018, and exposed the defendant's misconduct at the end of 2019. He was still disgusted by pornographic images afterwards.

The interrogation reminded him of the incident again, unable to bear seeing the defendant and hearing his voice again, and X was angry that the defendant attacked X's integrity and mental state.

In addition, X's mother also blamed herself for not discovering the incident earlier.

When sentencing, Supreme Court Judge Li Yunteng accused the defendant of being self-deprecating, poisoning his son, and continuing to commit crimes shamelessly and frequently.

(file picture)

The defendant's report stated that he had a history of paranoia and was wary and avoidant, and that experts were unable to assess his risk of recidivism.

The judge also revealed that the defendant was fired for leaving his post without permission when he was a police officer.

Official slams accused accused of being shockingly brazen

When sentencing, the judge pointed out that the defendant and X had no physical contact when he committed suicide, but also considered that X was immature at the time of the crime, and that the defendant, as X's biological father, had the responsibility to educate and discipline X, but failed to lead by example, instead Shamelessly committing disgusting obscenity.

The defendant indulged in sensuality and instigated his son.

Not only did he degenerate himself, but he also poisoned his son, brought harm to the next generation, or caused his son to have a distorted sexual concept, and affected his ability to establish relationships with the opposite sex.

The judge also pointed out that the defendant was a police officer at the time of the incident, which was an additional factor.

The judge pointed out that although the defendant did not use his power to commit the crime, he was appallingly and brazenly continued to commit the crime, which violated the responsibility of the police and the public's trust in the police.

The 47-year-old defendant was convicted in the High Court of four counts of indecent conduct against a child under the age of 16.

(Photo by Lu Yiming)

The defendant district court is involved in two other cases

The defendant is also involved in two other cases, one involving 32 counts of dishonesty and the other one involving neglect of a child in custody, both of which will be dealt with in the District Court.

The facts of the case allege that the defendant was still a police officer at the time of the crime, and he lived with his wife and X in a police quarters in Tuen Mun.

In March 2019, X revealed to the social worker that during the first hour of primary school, the defendant had taught him to go to the toilet to grab his genitals if his eyes were swollen in class. X said that he had tried it and thought it was effective.

Masturbate in front of son and ask if you do it

When X was about 10 years old and was in Primary 5, the defendant began to show him pornographic videos every week, including sexual intercourse, oral sex, etc., as well as sexual intercourse of men and women, men or women.

The defendant exposed and masturbated in front of X again, and asked X, "Are you doing it?" X followed suit later.

X refers to this later becoming frequent and doing it almost every day.

X once refused to masturbate, and the defendant once took out a stick and beat him, forcing X to submit.

X also claimed that X's mother was entering the room while watching a Premier League game with the defendant.

The defendant closed the bedroom door and asked X to masturbate together.

X refused, and the defendant covered X with a quilt, took out a knife, and forced X to do it together.

Xiangzi live-streams sex with his wife as a real-life demonstration

In addition, in his testimony, X revealed that once the defendant took him out and said that he had something to "celebrate", so he took him to the toilet cubicle of the shopping mall and masturbated in his own toilet cubicle.

X also said that the defendant had told him that X needed to watch a "real person demonstration", so the defendant installed a video camera in the room with his wife, and installed a program on X's mobile phone, so that X could watch the live broadcast of the defendant and X's mother having sex , the defendant asked X the next day, "Am I looking for Wanxiong or Xiongwu?" X pointed out that the defendant later removed and dropped the video camera, and deleted the program for viewing on his mobile phone.

When X mentioned the incident, he spoke bluntly and felt very perverted.

The defendant alleges that X was instigated to make a false accusation

In addition, it was revealed in the court that X suffered from autism spectrum disorder and adjustment disorder. He once had a hidden penis and an oversized foreskin, but later he underwent surgery and the lower body problem was cured.

During the trial, a urologist was also called to testify, saying that masturbation did not help the condition of the hidden penis.

The defendant denied all the allegations and said that because of the worsening relationship between him and his wife, X was caught in the middle. He suspected that X was instigated by others to falsely accuse his father.

Case number: HCCC 251/2021

Ex-police officer accused of forcing his son to watch porn and masturbation was convicted of four crimes including lewd conduct The defense alleges that the victim and the father changed from a relationship to hating the defendant. Hearing the words and weeping The doctor accused of self-destruction and helpless. The former police officer was accused of molesting relatives and children. He was accused of watching the live broadcast of parents' sexual intercourse. It was only Mengzi who denied that he heard the sound of drinking milk. Demonstration of the former police officer involved in serious sexual harassment of autistic children, watching live with his wife and having sex and asking: Are you a hero?

Source: hk1

All news articles on 2022-10-06

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.