The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Ruffin-Mélenchon: behind the scenes of a battle of ideas and ambitions

2022-11-18T18:48:22.057Z


STORY – Those close to the Insoumis leader accuse the Somme deputy of playing too much alone. As if to put out the start of the fire, François Ruffin posted a tweet on Thursday morning: “Media, don't dream. There will be no duel with my friend Jean-Luc Mélenchon. Our strengths combine to “do better”. The very media deputy of the Somme bounced on an Ifop poll published a little earlier by Paris Match. The survey compared his popularity to that of the former LFI presidential candidate. The m


As if to put out the start of the fire, François Ruffin posted a tweet on Thursday morning:

“Media, don't dream.

There will be no duel with my friend Jean-Luc Mélenchon.

Our strengths combine to “do better”.

The very media deputy of the Somme bounced on an Ifop poll published a little earlier by

Paris Match.

The survey compared his popularity to that of the former LFI presidential candidate.

The match is tight: if 39% of respondents prefer the leader of the Insoumis, they are still 36% to give the advantage to Picard (25% neither).

Enough to legitimize the ambitions of the eternal free electron of La France insoumise who repeats wanting to play

"a role"

in the future of the left.

François Ruffin therefore wants to be clear: he will not be a candidate if Jean-Luc Mélenchon lets himself be tempted by a fourth presidential adventure.

But what if he didn't go back?

“This survey shows that the subjects it covers on the trades of the link, the forgotten of the Republic, the territories…

This article is for subscribers only.

You have 86% left to discover.

Black-Friday

-70% on digital subscription

I ENJOY IT

Already subscribed?

Login

Source: lefigaro

All news articles on 2022-11-18

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.