Macronie is now trying to justify its obstruction.
Thursday evening, November 24, the parliamentary niche of La France insoumise turned into a particularly heated debate.
After the withdrawal of the text devoted to the abolition of bullfighting, the deputies considered the bill aimed at reintegrating unvaccinated caregivers.
Aware of the possibility of being outvoted, the Renaissance elected officials rushed to table a series of sub-amendments, aimed solely at slowing down the debates.
A successful operation, since the text could not ultimately be put to the vote.
Invited to Europe 1 on Friday morning, the interim president of the presidential majority group, Sylvain Maillard, defended this strategy by insistently targeting the content of the text.
"
They chose an antivax, conspiratorial text, with a sort of alliance between the National Rally, La France insoumise and the various overseas deputies, on remarks that were just unbearable and unacceptable
", he said. thus unfolded.
Before hammering out his desire to "
fight these conspiratorial and antivax ideas
".
According to the elected official, the session was "
difficult
", but "
we stood firm against these theories
", once again, "
conspiracies and antivax
".
The deputy criticizes the Insoumis for having made “
a mishmash
”, mixing the shortage of hospital staff and the reintegration of the non-vaccinated.
"
Let's fight against this conspiratorial idea that basically, vaccines are still dangerous
", still saw fit to specify Sylvain Maillard.
Since the end of the session, opposition from all sides has continued to rise up against this attitude.
On social networks, the leader of RN deputies, Marine Le Pen, denounced a "
democratic scandal
".
The Insoumis François Ruffin for his part saw a “
ridiculous
” approach.
Even the deputy Yannick Favennec, yet a member of Horizons and therefore a majority partner, regretted that the government had "
blocked this debate
": "
We had to let the discussion take place
".