The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Secret services: bosses will be allowed to spend more money on hospitality in the future

2022-11-26T11:08:15.476Z


The Court of Auditors recently reprimanded the intelligence services for not being too generous with food. According to SPIEGEL information, the chancellery has now decided that the presidents will be given more leeway on the issue.


Enlarge image

President of the Office for the Protection of the Constitution Thomas Haldenwang

Photo: Kay Nietfeld/ DPA

In the future, the federal intelligence services will be allowed to spend significantly more on hospitality than the usual 30 euros per person, at least for “occasions of special importance”.

The Federal Chancellery informed the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution, the Federal Intelligence Service and the Military Counterintelligence Service in letters classified as secret.

The reason for the change by the Federal Government is that the Federal Court of Auditors, which examines the expenditure of all authorities, criticized the Office for the Protection of the Constitution because the costs were too high at a conference.

SPIEGEL reported on this at the beginning of November.

In September last year, a delegation from a foreign intelligence service was lavishly entertained at this event.

Costs of 143 euros per person were incurred for dinner, and even 203 euros per person for lunch on a specially rented catamaran, i.e. up to 577 percent more than actually allowed.

The parliamentary control body of the Bundestag, which controls the work of the intelligence services, then advocated allowing the presidents of the intelligence services "discretionary leeway" on such occasions.

Foreign services are much more generous than the German ones.

akm/mba

Source: spiegel

All news articles on 2022-11-26

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.