The Turkish aggression on Syrian territory continues, causing more human and material losses in the targeted areas, for which the Turkish regime bears full responsibility for the security defect, when it used it during the past ten years as a theater for the entry of international terrorists into Syria.
Whoever thinks that this regime wants to establish safety and stability on both sides of the Syrian-Iraqi border with his country is mistaken. He uses this argument and employs it internally and externally. This is confirmed by the fact that the two sides of the Syrian-Turkish border did not witness before the terrorist war on Syria any significant security situation or cause damage. over decades.
Turkish officials talk about the same thing and its opposite at the same time. In the meetings of the Astana formula, they announce their country's commitment to respecting Syria's sovereignty and non-interference in its internal affairs. Before the nineteenth meeting of this formula, they launch a new aggression on Syrian territory, and they make statements about striving to establish a security belt inside Iraqi territory. And Syria, and this in itself is a flagrant violation of Syrian and Iraqi sovereignty.
For decades, the Turkish people have been suffering from inadequate treatment of the problem of the PKK and similar armed Kurdish parties and organizations, and instead of finding internal political or security solutions, Turkish governments have resorted to exporting the problem to northern Iraq, and are now trying to extend it to northern Syria despite the limited cases. Security forces in that region despite being employed by the Turkish regime to bring in international terrorists, form militias, and interfere in Syrian internal affairs.
The Turkish aggressive operation on both sides of the Syrian-Iraqi border will not bring security to Turkey or eliminate those whom Ankara calls terrorists. Rather, it will contribute to widening the security imbalance. It seems that the Turkish regime is not seeking to find a permanent solution to the problem of these militants, and insists on using their presence on The internal and regional levels, and in its relations with the old continent and the United States, and if this regime had any intention to solve this problem, it would have activated the agreements signed with Iraq and Syria, which will automatically lead to the consolidation of stability on the borders between the three countries and open the door to finding political solutions that lead to Finally, to address the problem of the Kurdish militants and turn this region into an area for economic and agricultural cooperation between the three countries.
The recent Turkish statements about the intention to establish a security belt along the Syrian-Iraqi border with Turkey converge with the aggressive concept of the Israeli enemy entity, but practical experience has shown that applying this concept is useless on all fronts with this entity, and the Turkish regime must take lessons from this. The bitter experience of this entity, whose security situation has become much more dangerous in light of the resistance's acquisition of military means capable of striking the Israeli depth.
There is no doubt that there is a big difference between the Turkish and Israeli cases. The solution to the fabricated problems on the part of the Turkish regime on the borders with Syria and Iraq can happen in very large proportions if this regime is committed to respecting the values and obligations of good neighborliness and the signed agreements, and to stop interfering in the internal affairs of the two countries. .
The Turkish aggressive operation could lead to an escalation of the situation in the event that the Turkish regime proceeds to establish a security belt, and this would destroy all the continuous attempts by friendly parties to reform relations between Syria, Iraq and Turkey, which the Turkish regime destroyed by its involvement in the Western terrorist project in the region.