Noémie Halioua is editor-in-chief and correspondent in Paris for the I24 News channel. She co-wrote
Le Nouvel Antisémitisme en France
(ed. Albin Michel, 2018), wrote
The Sarah Halimi Affair
(ed. du Cerf, 2018) and has just published
r Les uns contre les autres - Sarcelles, du vivre-ensemble au vivre -separated
(ed. of the Cerf).
It is necessary to put the church back in the center of the village, the clocks on time, the dots on the "
i
".
Restating the obvious, recalling reality, returning to the fundamentals that intellectual terrorism is trying with all its might to hide.
The sky is blue in summer, the earth is round and most women don't want the "deconstructed" man that Green MP Sandrine Rousseau is delighted to have in her life (and whom she wants to make a model for others).
This undefined specimen that we imagine endowed with a penis but devoid of masculine attributes, neutral or even feminized, symbolically castrated.
Most do not fantasize about this man to whom they could lend their skirt or who cries rivers in front of a rose water film, who puts on makeup in the morning and waits to be invited to dinner.
They don't dream of this being with whom we're banging our ears all day long,
assuming her share of femininity
” in a joyful exhibition.
It may well be acclaimed by a certain elite all excited at the idea of breaking down sexual boundaries, in practice it does not attract many people.
Fashion magazines may rave about Timothée Chalamet's bare back at the Venice Film Festival, or applaud the new men's lace briefs from the Tom Ford Spring-Summer 2023 collection, a symbol of the advent of
"another definition of masculinity”
, these trappings have no chance of appearing on the list of Hanukkah gifts for ordinary mortals.
To their dismay, the law of universal attraction remains resistant to this homogenization of genders and sexes.
The majority of women know that the difference between the sexes is not a danger but a promise of adventure, that it is not a springboard towards inequality but a chance of encounter.
Noemie Halioua
The fact is, the boy bands that charm hordes of teenage girls at every gig, those that grace the covers of women's magazines or land lead roles in movies have little in common with Conchita Wurst or Bilal Hassani.
Not that it is inappropriate to fantasize about Conchita Wurst or Bilal Hassani, of course, who can be very likeable otherwise, but let's say that it is dishonest to set them up as a model of universal seducers.
On the other hand, each year, the American magazine People ranks the podium of the sexiest men on the planet: in 2021, it is the actor Paul Rudd who has been consecrated, succeeding Michael B. Jordan, George Clooney, Brad Pitt or even Idris Elba.
Apollos infinitely popular with female audiences, at ease in their pomp, not "
deconstructed
nor sensitive to “
gender fluidity
” for a penny.
Unless the spectacle of Elba in a heel or Clooney with false eyelashes escaped me, in which case it would be wise to point it out in the comments of this post.
Read alsoRadical feminists attack the leaders of the Nupes
The fact is that regardless of aggressive militant discourse, most women continue to favor strong and built, conquering and powerful men, let's even say protective since we are not afraid of words, in which they do not instinctively perceive a rapist potential or a rival otherness that justifies a declaration of war.
The majority of women know that the difference between the sexes is not a danger but a promise of adventure, that it is not a springboard towards inequality but a chance of encounter.
Let's go even further: for most women, it is precisely this difference that is considered exciting, erogenous, exciting, like the electromagnetic interactions that cause two opposite charges to strongly attract each other.
The new inquisitors want to rebuild the imaginations and to do this create new gadgets, new words, new expressions.
Noemie Halioua
Even yesterday, this assertion would not have been worth scratching a few lines on electronic paper, but today it is considered retrograde, old-fashioned, humiliating and has every chance of provoking torrents of insults.
This statement which would have been an unnamed banality yesterday has become revolutionary, an act of delinquency vis-à-vis the dominant thought.
A risk of being chased by a handful of aggressive activists who judge the majority of women indoctrinated, victims of brainwashing and gender stereotypes from which they believe they are liberated.
We would not be able to understand that we want what society has taught us to want, in short we want badly, while they believe themselves from the height of their infinite contempt, freed from all ideology.
Driven by a gigantic condescension, they set themselves the goal of straightening up these poor girls (therefore us), re-educating them until they understand what they must desire and love.
Women in their majority do not plebiscite the deconstructed man?
So we need to "
to change mentalities
”, to re-educate their deviant desire, to twist these primary aspirations under the pretext of putting them right side up.
Make Sandrine Rousseau's "deconstructed man" the sexual beast everyone dreams of, make it a universal symbol and impose it against all odds.
A bit like those unworthy parents who force the spoon of cod liver into the mouth of the child who does not want it, imagining that this way the bastard will learn to appreciate it, when he ends up the most often by spitting in their face.
Read alsoSandrine Rousseau, the feminist who dreams of carrying ecology in 2022
The new inquisitors want to rebuild the imaginations and to do this create new gadgets, new words, new expressions.
For example by using an expansive definition of “
toxic masculinity
” or “
benevolent sexism
”.
The first aims to condemn the deep nature of the being with a penis by criminalizing it, that is to say denying it its innocence in order to build this artificially "
deconstructed
" specimen, ideologically and chemically "
pure
", conforming to the system of values considered "
irreproachable "
», lobotomized, infinitely conditioned.
The second, to reject everything that constitutes the asymmetry of the relationship of seduction that makes women melt: gallantry, the instinct of protection, the spirit of conquest.
The project aims to domesticate crowds, make men feel guilty for what they are, women for what they want, by affirming to both that they are only reproducing internalized social norms
in order, ultimately
, to make the encounter lapsed.
Make the other similar, the same, for everyone, and thus joyfully sign the end of humanity.
Alas, the inquisitors have forgotten the ultimate lesson of totalitarianism: it is the search for excessive purity that underlies the toxicity of these regimes.
Reason why the writer Pierre Cormary uses, to qualify these inquisitors, the term very
appropriately "excisors"
, in reference to those castrators of traditional societies who cut the clitoris of young women with a piece of glass, to prevent them from feeling pleasure and enjoying.
A process aimed at better controlling these young women, submitting them to the desire of others, making them pure objects that would not be thwarted by their own desire.
In the name of a chimerical emancipation from sexual duality, Western circumcisers have as their end the guilt of the flesh, the abolition of the sexes, the liquidation of desire and pleasure, enjoyment and love, anarchists by nature, which always admit a degree of asymmetry and vulnerability, even chaos.
Postmodernity wants to put an end to sexuality and love, accused of all the evils of the world, a Promethean project lost in advance,
"the will to live of the species"
, in the words of Arthur Schopenhauer.
