The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Laurence de Charette: "No longer giving life to save the planet?"

2022-12-15T18:54:40.213Z


NOTEBOOK - To the sad souls of environmentalism, we must remember that it is from the objectification of the world, and not from its fecundity, that the excesses of ultramaterialism are born, those which, precisely, eat away at the souls and devour resources.


Is it still allowed to celebrate a birth, when the Earth has just registered 8 billion human beings on board, of which it already does not know what to do?

We ended up, by drowning it in the imperatives of the consumer society, by excusing Christmas for not being quite a secular celebration;

but would we forgive him for a dogmatic departure from the ecological diktat?

A few years ago, a new injunction surreptitiously slipped into the green discourse: not having children would be the ultimate civic gesture, the only behavior that befits anyone who would love the planet and its inhabitants a little.

Researchers at the Swedish University of Lund have in fact imagined calculating the “climate cost” of a child: they evaluated it at 60 tonnes of CO2 equivalent per year.

The matter then appeared to be even more serious than driving (2.4 tonnes of CO2 per year) or eating meat (0.8 tonnes of CO2 per year), an attitude that is nevertheless readily decried nowadays. .

Read alsoAntoine Bueno - Fabrice Hadjadj: "Should we limit births to save the planet?"

The authors…

This article is for subscribers only.

You have 86% left to discover.

Freedom is also to go to the end of a debate.

Keep reading your article for €0.99 for the first month

I ENJOY IT

Already subscribed?

Login

Source: lefigaro

All news articles on 2022-12-15

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.