Goldnadel: "The political recovery of the massacre in Paris no longer poses a problem for the left"

Hide this breast that I cannot see!

The extreme left has read Tartuffe, forgetting that tartufferie is ultimately punished.

One of the main sources of irritation that the contemporary left inspires lies in the gap between what it says and what it does.

Let's start with the sad news.

As soon as William M. had committed his terrible massacre in a Kurdish place, France Insoumise, Clémentine Autain in the lead, incriminated "the extreme right" and demanded to draw political consequences.

A few hours later, thugs armed with clubs in the right hand and red flags in the left, attacked the police in the tenth arrondissement of Paris.

I remind you that the assassination of little Lola, by an Algerian national under OQTF, had not given rise to any abuse, but that the anger generated by this situation had been held by the Insoumis and the media left for an odious recovery.

Another recent example of the vertiginous discrepancy between the nobility of speech and the baseness of actions concerns the relationship with money.

The European left is so tough on corruption that it was the first in the European Parliament to demand severe sanctions against the right-wing Hungarian government of Victor Orban.

Unfortunately, we learned that Greek and Italian deputies, all socialists, were being prosecuted, some imprisoned, within the framework of very serious corruption for the benefit of Qatar.

More than a million dollars in cash was seized by the Belgian financial police.

It will be noted, in passing, that the press did not really insist on the political color of the defendants.

We can assume that it would have been otherwise if the presumed corrupt had lived on the other side.

The left, which tracks down the slightest word of anti-Semitism in decline when it comes from the old Christian world, supports it with a philosophy worthy of the Stoics when it comes from the Islamic part.

Gilles-William Goldnadel

The left is also illustrated by a gap between practice and theory in the field of the fight against racism.

She theorized the fight against racism, and put it into practice thanks to various associations.

But as Jean Baudrillard noticed, the curious title of “SOS Racisme” seemed to hide the unthought of wanting to save him, by exalting the victim feelings of some and the guilt of others.

Its more recent racialist offspring has made dad's old anti-racism, which ignored race, outdated and turned him into a machine for unashamedly hating the white man, because of hereditary racial privilege.

Apart from this mad moral regression, it is useless as well as tiresome to notice that the left, which hunts down the slightest wrong word of a declining anti-Semitism when it comes from the old Christian world, supports it with a philosophy worthy of the Stoics when it comes with unbridled violence from the Islamic side.

Read alsoAnti-Semitism is increasing, according to 64% of French Jews

Another area of ​​aggravated regression: Yesterday, the left wanted to be libertarian.

It was forbidden to forbid.

Today, she holds Anastasie's scissors, advocates cancel culture and hunts for statues of Napoleon.

His new enemy is called Elon Musk because he, among other things, dared to restore the account of Professor Raoult who had extolled the benefits of chloroquine.

Similarly, while “left” has long been synonymous with “democracy”, the more or less authoritarian power exercised by Jean-Luc Mélenchon over his party is puzzling.

We will end as we began, with the bosom of Tartuffe.

The fight against violence against women was part of the reserved domain of France Insoumise.

Feminism fell within her private domain, almost under the appellation contrôlée.

Intransigence was a virtue and suspicion an absolute duty.

The misguided right, which dared to invoke the presumption of innocence, immediately saw its complicity presumed.

But Taha Bouhafs and Adrien Quatennens violently brought the party back to reality.

Even the censors can fail.

SEE ALSO

- Murder of Lola: is political recovery going too far?