There were days not long ago when it was announced that "the era of Netanyahu is over", at the press conference incoming Justice Minister Yariv Levin clarified that "the era of Aharon Barak is over".
The reform of the Minister of Justice is a coup for the judicial coup.
Levin left no stone unturned and with the help of the chisel of the members of the Ecclesiastical Forum, led by Dr. Aviad Bakshi and together with Prof. Rafi Biton, they dismantled the wall of judicial activism that had been introduced here for many years.
The late Supreme Court judge Moshe Landoi was the one who warned Barak and his friends about what happened tonight.
"I went to Barak and told him that he lives inside this beautiful court building like inside an aquarium, but neither he nor the other judges who go with him are sensitive to what is done outside the aquarium."
In the past, Landoi said that he spoke and wrote against the court's entry into public disputes and its desire to instill values that "what is no less serious is that the values of depth in question are actually the values of depth of a certain sector".
Judge Landoy warned Barak and his friends, photo: None
After the court did not wait for Landoi's warnings, Supreme Court Judge Noam Solberg arrived and repeatedly disapproved of his friends, when they intervened in the legislation of basic laws at the Shapir High Court, when they invalidated the conscription law and the infiltrators law, and when they stretched the reason of reasonableness almost to infinity. Solberg wrote a founding article to correct the reason Probability and advocated a dramatic reduction. In fact, Solberg stated that administrative law, even without the reason for reasonableness, or with a weakened reason for reasonableness, constitutes a solid pillar for the integrity of the executive authority (the government) or, as he wrote in the licensing authority's ruling, "The 'good old' toolbox 'satisfies the goods well".
Levin's reform is basically good, the problem is that it is too good.
Apart from the rules of administrative law which most likely remain intact, in the absence of a rigid and armored constitution, there are no significant limitations on the government in Israel which also controls the Knesset.
You shouldn't shy away from the studios' fear of the "governance reform", but you should listen to it.
Conservatism prefers evolutions over revolutions, Levin's revolution anchors conservative values in an activist way.
The Minister of Justice, who will probably fight for the reform, should consider refining it.
For example, instead of canceling the reason for the likelihood of reduction as suggested by Judge Solberg and more.
Splitting the position of Attorney General is not part of Levin's reform and it is good that it is.
"The 'good old' toolbox 'delivers the goods' well", Solberg, photo: Noam Rivkin
Initiatives to reform the legal system must not collapse law enforcement in Israel and touch ongoing trials.
For the time being, she is not doing so, and it is good that she is, both substantively and due to cleaning up her lips because the amendments to the judicial system are a plot by the Prime Minister to escape from justice.
When Levin was asked if Netanyahu supports his plan, he slipped and did not answer.
Netanyahu to this day has been under the iron dome of the judicial system against initiatives like Levin's.
As long as his support is not clear, there is no certainty for the implementation of the reform.
Absurdly, the hope of the justice system is that a criminal defendant will save it from his friends.
were we wrong
We will fix it!
If you found an error in the article, we would appreciate it if you shared it with us
