The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

"You have to be careful!" : criticized, Julian Bugier reframes a former RMC “Grandes Gueules”

2023-01-20T16:44:43.977Z


Sylvain Grandserre, a teacher by profession, criticized the presenter for "doing the minimum" on media coverage of the strike against pension reform.


“2 minutes and 18 seconds to hear the disgruntled police and firefighters.

For the

1 p.m. of France 2

, minimum service on the huge mobilization against the pension reform yesterday

, ”tweeted Sylvain Grandserre this Friday afternoon.

This teacher, who we heard regularly in RMC's "Les Grandes Gueules", also attacked the presenter of the midday news.

“For Julian Bugier, it doesn't deserve more!

Instead, a 3.35-minute country report was aired

,” he added

.

Read also“Thin, I lost the train …”: in the middle of a transport strike, she misses her train because of BFMTV

In the process, the journalist responded by interposed tweets.

The counterpart of Marie-Sophie Lacarrau began her message with two hilarious emoticons before specifying that the edition of Thursday January 19 had devoted nearly

"twenty minutes to the strike against the pension reform"

.

Stressing that it was even a special page, Julian Bugier invited his interlocutor to

“be attentive”

.

If Sylvain Grandserre did not respond to the presenter, he attacked his former group of "Grandes Gueules" a few minutes later.

Also via Twitter, this author of books on education criticized the show for being

“in its own world”

.

The one who intervened for twelve years in the program of Alain Marschall and Olivier Truchot regrets the

"pseudo-debates favorable to Macron"

on the RMC channel.

"What a beautiful representative panel, while ¾ of the French are opposed to pension reforms,"

​​he concluded.

Source: lefigaro

All news articles on 2023-01-20

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.