Cristina Kirchner redoubled her offensive against the Judiciary this Friday and came out to
question a ruling by federal judge Sebastián Ramos
, who closed the case against the secretary of the Supreme Court Justice Horacio Rosatti, Silvio Robles, for the violation of rights civilians, including the privacy of making a complaint based on illegally obtained chats.
This is the cause of the alleged leaked chats with Marcelo D'Alessandro, the Buenos Aires Minister of Security and Justice with a license request, which were aired through a website a few weeks ago.
Cristina took the ruling and used it
to charge the Court
and compare the situation with the case for the Iran Memorandum.
"The media-judicial mafia, impunity and legal absurdity in the open
. It is time to wake up and warn that they are leading the institutions towards a dead end," he began with a Twitter thread.
"In 2016, in Comodoro Py, the Cassation Chambers Hornos and Borinsky reopened the Memorandum case with Iran, which had been dismissed... 2 times! They based it on "illegal wiretapping", they put Zannini in prison and prohibited Timerman from treating himself of cancer in the US", continued the vice president.
"Now in 2023, Judge Ramos of Comodoro Py in 20 days rejected the complaint against Silvio Robles, who fixed court rulings in chats with D'Alesandro, CABA Security Master, saying that he could not be charged with a crime
because the The complaint was based on "illegal listening," added Cristina.
The vice president also charged against the prosecutor Carlos Stornelli, who intervened in the file.
It so happens that the magistrate focused his decision on the minority vote of Ana María Figueroa, a judge close to the K, who had
rejected the reopening of the Iran case for using "illegal intelligence"
.
It was a blow to the strategy that Kirchnerism has against the origin of the chats.
Cristina Kirchner took the reverse and doubled the bet to put more pressure on justice.
"Today, at this point, the million dollar question must be asked: What will the Chamber of Cassation do now with the Memorandum case with Iran?" launched Cristina Kirchner.
On what was Ramos based to dismiss the complaint against D'Alessandro
Ramos considered that the file should be archived because the communications involving D'Alessandro were obtained through illegal espionage.
" Evidence or testimonies that have been obtained, as can be seen at this point, through organized maneuvers based on illegal intelligence activities,
cannot be admitted under any circumstances as part of a trial that respects due process," Ramos said.
"The judge must ensure that there is no arbitrary or illegal interference in the private life of people without justifiable reason," Ramos stated in the letter, adding that in no way should the State or other actors interfere in the
"private life of illegal manner".
The judge's decision has a high impact in the world of politics and in the impeachment trial that the Government is promoting against the Supreme Court of Justice.
One of the accusations that the ruling party wants to discuss in the Impeachment Commission are the communications between Robles and D'Alessandro.
With this ruling
, that evidence would at least be discredited since it was obtained illegally.
/cloudfront-eu-central-1.images.arcpublishing.com/prisa/KMEYMJKESBAZBE4MRBAM4TGHIQ.jpg)
