Wherever the Prime Minister goes, the High Court accompanies him.
Each party and since the Prime Minister directs the steering wheel has one more hand on the steering wheel.
Not Trumpeldor's hand, but the hand of the High Court of Justice who wants to turn the steering wheel upside down. For every step on the gas pedal, there is a long foot - of the High Court - that presses the brakes.
In front of the cameras on the court, you can clearly see Esther Hayut and Alex Stein stepping on the government's foot instead of trying to reach the ball.
You can't argue with Stein.
He claimed in writing that 400,000 Shas voters did not elect Deri as a minister. However, it was the Knesset that they elected that appointed Deri as a minister in the government and expressed confidence in him. Therefore, the High Court's intervention in Deri's matter is against the law and against the laws of democracy.
President Hayut opposes the Levin reform: "This year will be remembered as one in which the country's democratic identity was dealt a fatal blow" // Photo: Shmuel Buchris
President Hayut gave a speech of a leader of a political party.
She is now the pinnacle of the ruling class, or the first Israel.
Less than two weeks later it was also announced that she met with the organizer of the demonstrations Tzipi Livni who was the Minister of Justice.
Again, the suspicion arises that she did it as a political businessman.
If this is the case, why should we think that her ruling between these two partisan events is not tainted by political considerations?
The worst thing is that a political consideration is wrapped in legalese.
More than twenty years ago, the right-wing commentator Ben Dror Yamini coined the phrase: "Aharon Barak paves a road bypassing democracy."
This is the highway on which the High Court is racing at the head of the battalion.
Already about 30 years ago, the High Court ruled that the prime minister should fire Deri from the government and the result in the end was a rift in the nation and destruction. This was during the Oslo period, and then it was Aharon Barak himself who undid the seam between the Shas leadership and the leftist leadership.
Would Deri have been disqualified if Gantz had been his main partner? Netanyahu, Deri and Gantz (archive), photo: Oren Ben Hakon
"How appropriate is it for us, as a judicial authority, to enter the depths of the political orchard and penetrate its tangles, with the hope of emerging from it in peace?", wrote the late Chief Justice Menachem Alon.
He warned against the danger of "politicization of the judiciary, and damage to the public's trust in the objectivity of the judiciary".
Right.
Does anyone have any doubts that if Aryeh Deri and Shas had separated Gideon Sa'ar or Lapid or Bennett from the prime ministership, he would have come out of it as clear and clear as water and not as red as wine? Could Lieberman with his record serve as finance minister? Well, I know A personal messiah, because even Lieberman's biggest persecutors are sick of everything, provided Bibi does not return to the prime ministership.
Therefore, the government's dilemma now is what comes before why.
Continuous and vigorous action to realize the agenda for which the right-wing parties were elected in every field as if the Deri issue did not exist, or to work to return Deri to the government as if the other problems did not exist.
Since the Supreme Court became a partner in the attempted coup, the answer is that it is necessary to hold both ends.
The government must take the steps necessary for its existence and stability and at the same time act in the other areas in accordance with Eric Sharon's bulldozer motto: "Excellent, push forward!"
were we wrong
We will fix it!
If you found an error in the article, we would appreciate it if you shared it with us