The municipality of Irschenberg presented its next steps in gravel mining in a comprehensible manner, which was welcomed by many citizens.
The dialogue was the key.
A comment from Merkur editor Dieter Dorby.
It was an appointment that worked in many ways.
The citizens received first-hand information, the council members could show with their questions where they saw the neuralgic points, and in the end there was a comprehensible, majority-capable result.
There was even applause from the audience.
All of this shows that dialogue is the key.
This also applies to the district office.
The scoping appointment, which was already suggested at the BI information evening, is a good opportunity to have the path taken checked: are the authorities going along with it?
Are you convinced by the arguments?
Or does she see essential points not sufficiently taken into account?
Also read the report on the comment:
These are Irschenberg's next steps in gravel mining
However, the members of the municipal council have to say goodbye to one thing: they will not get the legal certainty they so long for.
The matter is too specific, there are too few comparative cases.
In the end, the gravel project in Irschenberg boils down to a case-by-case decision - a custom-made product, nothing off the peg.
But you don't have to be afraid of that.
Ultimately, it's about making a proper assessment and backing it up with comprehensible arguments.
That should then be able to hold up in court.
ddy
