Discuss before deciding.
This is the watchword of the Nupes which, on this new day of mobilization, appears in all its states.
In question, the surprise draw that took place this Tuesday morning at the conference of the presidents of the Assembly, cutting the debate on the referendum motion which will be debated next week at the Palais Bourbon, before the examination of the pension reform project.
A random appeal, supposed to decide between the two almost identical texts which were in competition: that of the Communists - co-signed by the PCF, the PS, EELV and LFI -, and that of the National Rally.
However, it was that of the Lepenists who won the case, while the elected representatives of the left considered that their motion – tabled before that of the RN – should be, according to the regulations, the one which should have been put automatically to the
Nothing will happen.
Result, the four groups of the Nupes are now forced to settle another debate: should we vote for the motion tabled by the National Rally?
A question that embarrasses everyone and which, according to our information, has already caused a stir internally.
It must be said that the text of the nationalists has exactly the same aim as that of the communists, namely, to impose a referendum on the government and put an end to the executive bill before it is even examined.
"
For the moment, we are contesting this draw which is contrary to the regulations of the National Assembly
", dodges for example the Insoumis Manuel Bompard, before specifying that the question of the vote of this motion had to "
be discussed
" quickly .
Same with the Communists.
“
We dispute and we implement other strategies before making a decision on the vote
”, also shies away André Chassaigne from
Le Figaro
.
The boss of the PCF deputies had spoken to the press a little earlier to denounce a “
violation of the regulations (…) unacceptable
”.
“The environmental group will be coherent”
On the socialist side, if we also dispute the method used in the morning, we want to be a little clearer.
“
No, we will not vote for this motion
”, indicates bluntly the president of the socialist group, Boris Vallaud, to
Figaro
.
Before environmentalists follow suit.
“
We do not accept this decision but it is clear that we will never vote for a text from the RN
”, indicates the president of the group, Cyrielle Chatelain.
“
The environmental group will be coherent.
We have never voted for any of their proposals and we will continue to do so
,” she adds.
The only camp to be satisfied with the situation: the presidential majority, which sees some of its concerns dissipate.
Aware that the text of the RN will necessarily be more divisive than that of the Communists on the benches of the hemicycle.
“
With that of the left, we would have had all the Nupes, the RN and the 20 LIOT against us.
And with the absenteeism of the Republicans, the text would have had a chance to pass.
However, the RN motion will not succeed, and everyone knows it
, ”decrypts a Renaissance deputy, relieved by the news.
