Fear of voting?
While the discussions on the pension reform continued, Thursday afternoon, Jean-Luc Mélenchon interfered in the parliamentary debates.
On Twitter, the Insoumis judged
"incomprehensible"
the strategy of the PCF, which withdrew its amendments to speed up the pace with a view to the examination, even the vote, of the famous article 7, which provides for the postponement of the legal age. at age 64.
“
Why rush?
The rest of the law doesn't count?
Can't wait to get beat up?"
, he questioned.
Despite the relative majority of macronists in the Assembly, Jean-Luc Mélenchon knows that the announced support of LR for the executive will
ultimately
make it possible to adopt this flagship measure, and therefore the text as a whole at first reading.
Like him, some on the left fear that approval by the Lower House will be a fatal blow to mobilization in the streets.
Which, after having been massive at first, is in the process of withering in the country.
The tweet of the former third man in the presidential election is therefore also a means of maintaining pressure on the LFI deputies, tempted to in turn withdraw their thousands of amendments, as demanded by the inter-union.
“
I want Article 7 to be discussed.
It's the crux, what matters to people
“, had for example defended François Ruffin in
Liberation
on February 5th.
“Drag the debates”
Very quickly after the release of Jean-Luc Mélenchon, the government did not fail to denounce this
"confession
" of the Insoumis.
“It means 'we know that we are in the minority, that we don't have a majority to defeat the government, so we have to drag out the debates'.
It is inadmissible”
, rebuked Gabriel Attal, Minister of Public Accounts.
"He is saying very clearly
'
it's the Nupes, it's LFI which is blocking
'
"
, also denounced the deputy boss of the Renaissance deputies, Sylvain Maillard.
Last week, on BFMTV, Jean-Luc Mélenchon had already said his refusal to see his troops remain powerless in the face of the government's choice to resort to a "programmed legislative time".
In question, the legislative vehicle adopted - the amending budget of Social Security -, which makes it possible to override a possible obstruction via article 47-1.
“I am for us to vote on article 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9”
, had pretended to certify the Insoumis.
Before specifying:
“The government is not obliged to stop the debate on Friday.
Therefore, if on Friday we did not vote for article 7 (the last, editor's note), it will be the fault of the government, not of the rebels, "he
hammered, recalling that his people were
" not the good guys doggies of Mr.
.
