At the beginning of the week, Jackie Azoulay filed a NIS 150,000 lawsuit against the network anchor Aviv Reuven to the court, after he wrote about her on his Instagram, among other things: "How bad is it possible to be a bad mother, a bad divorcee, a bad wife and a bad human being."
According to the lawsuit, Azoulai calls herself a famous public figure, a reality star and a successful Israeli celebrity.
Reuven posted on Instagram in his account that has 315 thousand followers an advertisement about her that amounts to slander and did so with the intention to hurt.
"How bad a mother, a bad divorcee, a bad wife and a bad person can you be to post such a personal message one specific week that this amazing father was busy and misrepresent to stoke the fire and try to atone for the fact that you are a bad mother who prefers to hang out with guys the age of nephews Mine, instead of being a mother to your children! I wish for all my lovers a father like Israel and a mother and a divorcee like you, I don't wish for my enemies either."
"The plaintiff will claim that the publication as published is a publication that humiliated the plaintiff in the eyes of humanity, and the publication about the plaintiff was made as a target of hatred, contempt or ridicule in the eyes of humanity... It is enough to read the publications published on websites entitled "Jackie Azoulai was humiliated and threatened with a lawsuit" "a bad mother and wife" In order to prove that this is a publication that is defamatory as defined by law," the lawsuit states, "the defendant chose to present a false factual representation as if she were dating young men instead of being a mother to her children... A simple review of the agreement between her and her ex-divorce is enough to prove that the time spent The plaintiff with her children costs ten times more than the time that her ex-husband is with their children. But the factual truth did not prevent the defendant from spewing lies and slurs about the plaintiff in order to humiliate and trample and cause ridicule and contempt."
Aviv Reuven has not yet submitted a statement of defense to the lawsuit, but his attorney responded to Azulai, when she gave him a warning before proceeding, in which he stated that this was an expression of opinion and that the reasonable person understood that this was his personal opinion and there is no basis for a defamation lawsuit.
"Your network turned to Szhai minutes after the publication, and did not ask for the publication to be deleted at all. A matter that raises questions regarding the degree of damage to its name... Szhai detailed in the publication, which is a criticism and defense of the personal matter of his friend to whom the publication was directed, his opinion on the conduct of There is no dispute and there cannot be because there is a public interest in this publication, while your network is publishing to all of you a partial personal message that she received from her ex-divorce," the letter reads, "your network is indeed a famous public figure and as such, especially when she chooses to publish her personal life on the networks Socially, she is exposed to more public criticism, as in the present case when she chose to hurt Groush Shelah and publish their personal conversations in a public way...
My sender would like to apologize if he offended her in said review.
He had no intention of doing so, and all he wanted was to defend a personal interest as a minister of his friend, to whom the publication was directed, and to criticize the publication of private and partial matters between spouses in front of the entire Alma.
On top of that, I am sorry if your sister's children were indeed harmed, since his whole intention was to act precisely for their sake in order to get your sister not to behave the way she used to."
were we wrong
We will fix it!
If you found an error in the article, we would appreciate it if you shared it with us
