Kirchnerism
denied that there is a conflict with Human Rights organizations
, after criticism from Estela de Carlotto, Nora Cortiñas and the Memoria, Verdad y Justicia Meeting on the call to mobilize against the supposed "ban" of Cristina Kirchner on the 24th of March.
"Cristina would never think of holding a party rally on March 24," emphasized the Secretary for Human Rights, Horacio Pietragalla Corti.
"I am a militant of La Cámpora and also one of the men and women who recovered our identity thanks to the Grandmothers of Plaza de Mayo. I do
n't like that they put an inmate where there isn't one,
which is what the Clarín cover did today. upset because there is an affective relationship between this organization and human rights organizations," said Pietragalla Corti in statements to FM La Patriada.
In this way, the official pointed to the media that reflected the statements of the head of Grandmothers of Plaza de Mayo, who said that March 24 is a date to commemorate the disappearance of 30,000 people and not for issues
To Carlotto's statements, the voice of the president of the Mothers of Plaza de Mayo Línea Fundadora was also added.
"Neither La Cámpora nor any organization or political party can carry out that day (a demonstration), when we are still paying the consequences of State terrorism," Cortiñas said this Wednesday on AM 990.
For its part, from EMVyj, which every year organizes the mobilization for Remembrance Day, differentiating itself from the official party's call, also criticized the Kirchnerist call.
Kirchnerism was preparing an operative outcry for March 24.
Photo Luis ROBAYO / AFP.
"We reiterate our rejection of any attempt to assimilate the most heartfelt date on the national calendar to this or that partisan interest. This desire for cooptation trivializes the date and also plays into the hands of the anti-rights right, which for years has encouraged denial of the genocide, of the 30,000 and of the fight for human rights," they said in a statement.
However, Pietragalla Corti assured that "there is no conflict" and that the owner of Grandmothers never intended to "make a difference".
"Yesterday I listened to the interview and spoke to Estela afterwards. Cristina
would never think of doing a party act on March 24
because it was a conquest of the organizations and it is her day. Estela knows it, but yesterday she understood that Cristina was going to do a act and that he was going to speak on March 24," he added.
In December, during her reappearance at the event in Avellaneda after the conviction in the Highway case, the vice president called to mobilize on that date against the "mafias".
Shortly after, Andrés "Cuervo" Larroque, general secretary of La Cámpora, ratified that work was being done on that date to carry out an electoral mobilization and in support of the former president.
"Cristina made a very important call for March 24 and today the militancy has to come out of that state of lethargy and a certain discouragement, after going through a rather gray moment in political terms, which can mean the disappointment of the current management , which had generated other types of expectations," said the Buenos Aires official.
The nation's Secretary of Human Rights assured that "all politics accompanies this call with the central slogan" and that the political organizations add "some sub slogans."
"Human rights organizations have a very strong voice of their own and that is what will happen on March 24, but it bothers them that what they are carrying out is made visible in places that have legitimacy," the secretary remarked.
The national official also referred to the supposed "proscription" of the vice, which generates a rift within the government coalition of the Frente de Todos, and pointed to the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation.
"The president of Brazil (Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva) was imprisoned for a year and a half in a 'lawfare' case. What is the technicality that is being discussed? If Cristina wanted to be a candidate tomorrow, how long will it take for the Court
to Supreme Court to make the sentence firm?"
she stated.
"Cristina herself said it: they ban her because they want the Peronist candidate to be convicted of corruption. That is a ban in fact," he concluded.
look too
Nora Cortiñas added her criticism of La Cámpora for the act of March 24: "It cannot be used for an electoral battle"
Upset in Grandmothers with La Cámpora for the call to march on March 24 against the "ban" of Cristina Kirchner