The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Stealing jealousy from wife, husband dissatisfied with separated wife, knowing man, rape twice in one night, official denounces double standard, jailed for 7 and a half years

2023-02-22T22:26:07.649Z


The site foreman discovered that the estranged wife was in contact with men, broke into his wife's house at night, raped his wife and forced anal sex several times in one night, and even stuffed her private parts with skin care products, forcing her to kneel down and penetrate from behind. After he was prosecuted, during the collection period


The site foreman discovered that the estranged wife was in contact with men, broke into his wife's house at night, raped his wife and forced anal sex several times in one night, and even stuffed her private parts with skin care products, forcing her to kneel down and penetrate from behind.

After he was prosecuted, he repeatedly asked his wife to withdraw the case during his detention.

The foreman had earlier admitted the crime of attempting to obstruct justice, and after trial, he was convicted of two counts of rape. The case was sentenced in the High Court today (22nd). Judge Zhang Huiling pointed out that the defendant claimed that because he saw his wife's mobile phone, he found her a man. , he raped her "too much", but he also developed a relationship with another woman before the incident, criticizing him for double standards, and saying: "It's okay for him (the defendant) to commit adultery, but X (the victim) went out with someone else. No way.” The defendant was sentenced to seven and a half years in prison.


Any woman has the right to refuse sexual intercourse with anyone, including her husband.

High Court Judge Cheung Wai Ling

Originally charged with 4 counts of rape and 1 count of sodomy

The 44-year-old defendant was originally charged with 4 counts of rape and 1 count of anal sex without consent, a total of 5 crimes. The jury only found 2 counts of rape and the remaining 3 counts of acquittal.

In addition, he pleaded guilty in 2021 to one count of committing an act with the intention of obstructing justice.

The case occurred from the early morning to 6:30 am on September 14, 2019. The victim X was 39 years old when the case occurred.

The 44-year-old defendant was convicted of rape after trial.

(profile picture)

Defendant used cork to X private parts

When sentencing, the judge pointed out that the defendant was convicted of two crimes of rape, which meant that the defendant had a sexual act after following X into the house that night.

Later, the defendant went to the living room to check X's mobile phone, and found that X was in contact with male friend K. The defendant slapped X angrily, pinched her chest vigorously and raped her.

Soon, the defendant used X’s mobile phone to make an appointment with K to “open the room”. After K replied that he agreed to “open the room”, the defendant became angry again, and then pushed X into the room, stuffed bottles of skin care products and toner into X’s private parts, and forced her to kneel The lower reuse bottle is inserted from the back.

8 times sent a letter to X asking to withdraw the case

As for the crime of obstructing justice, the judge cited that after X reported to the police, the defendant was arrested on the same day, but sent letters to the victim X eight times during the detention period, claiming to resolve the incident, asking her to drop the charges, and promising to pay legal fees for X.

The defendant also called X many times when he was escorted to the court for hearing, asking him to contact his brother.

The event traumatized X a lot

The judge mentioned that the defendant was not a first-time offender. He had broken up with another female partner because he was dissatisfied, and then threatened the other party. He was convicted of criminal intimidation in 2019 and was imprisoned for 4 months.

X’s trauma report showed that the incident had deeply hurt her. She did not know until the trial of the case that the defendant had developed relationships with other women before she was sexually assaulted. She was also upset that the defendant was only partially convicted.

She was also criticized on the Internet, and was unhappy to be cross-examined by defense lawyers during the trial, fearing that the defendant would retaliate against her after she was released.

Judge Zhang Huiling pointed out that the defendant interceded and claimed that he found out that his estranged wife had been in contact with a man and raped his wife because of "excessive arousal", but did he ever think about committing adultery himself?

The officer asked the defendant if he ever considered committing adultery himself

The defense pleaded that the defendant raped his wife twice in a short period of time because he saw the messages between his wife and other men and was "overwhelmed".

The judge pointed out that the defendant "had a relationship" with another woman before the case, and criticized him for not allowing his wife to date other men, and even using unnecessary force to forcibly have sex with X. The judge said: "It is not true that he committed adultery himself. "The judge emphasized that he must make a moral criticism, but believed that the defendant had "double standards."

The defendant's behavior was a great insult to X

The judge continued that the two had relationship problems at the time, and it was easy to understand that X was afraid of getting pregnant and did not want the defendant to have sex with her without wearing a condom. The defendant did not use a condom in the two rape incidents, which was an added penalty.

After the defendant raped X for the first time, he was even more angry when he saw her phone messages, so he used more force on her, which was a great insult to X.

Any woman has the right to refuse sexual intercourse including her husband

The judge stated that any woman has the right to refuse to have sexual intercourse with others, including her husband, but X had had sexual intercourse before breaking up with the defendant. Compared with being followed and raped by a stranger, X was sexually assaulted by her husband relatively less seriously.

Fortunately, X was not affected and the defendant was punished by law

In addition, the judge believed that the defendant kept calling X after the incident and insisted that she withdraw the case. Fortunately, X was not affected, otherwise the defendant would not have to be punished by law for committing two serious rape crimes.

Considering the above factors, the judge finally sentenced him to 7 and a half years in prison for the three charges.

Case number: HCCC284/2020

Land worker involved in 7 hours of sexual assault on separated wife 4 raped 1 sodomy and fell asleep too tired Police patted and woke up arrested husband involved 1 night 4 raped 1 sodomized wife convicted of 2 rapes Rape 1 sodomy wife The victim begged to let the defendant go after the first rape Wife’s defense claims that X enjoys devotion and pleasure during sexual intercourse. X completely denies husband’s involvement in 1 night and 4 rapes of 1 sodomized wife accused of tying his wife’s hands with wires. Defendant Alleges His Wife Was Sensitive To Drinking, Her Face Was Swollen, Stressed She Never Hit Women

Source: hk1

All news articles on 2023-02-22

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.