The plot is so well put together that it seems straight out of Agatha Christie's imagination.
But the novelist would have ended up giving us the key to the enigma.
Criminals do not have these considerations.
To discover
“Koh-Lanta, the sacred fire”: date, candidates, news… Everything you need to know
More than thirty years after the murder of Ghislaine Marchal, doubt continues to hover over the circumstances of her death.
Admittedly,
Omar Raddad
was sentenced to 18 years in prison, before being partially pardoned in 1996 by Jacques Chirac.
But the intimate convictions of each other have not finished clashing.
Duel of lawyers
The authors of this documentary summarize the facts effectively, making sure that the viewer can grasp the complexity of the case.
A downside, the fictitious illustration scenes are not the most successful.
The duel of lawyers, questioned separately, turns out to be much more interesting.
“
Omar, who was going to the casino, needed money
,” thunders Me Henri Leclerc.
A request for an advance to his boss will have slipped.
Read alsoMarco Mouly, Anna Sorokin, Bernard Madoff… Why our screens are addicted to scammers
Omar Raddad was all kindness, the defense responds.
And there is a solid alibi: the gardener had gone to lunch.
The inscriptions “Omar killed me” would therefore not count for anything?
His DNA does not appear anywhere, recalls his lawyer.
Nothing that does not make her innocent, according to Henri Leclerc.
“
Like in an Agatha Christie book, people refuse to have the key to the enigma right under their noses!
“
, swears the tenor in an article in Le
Monde
.
This documentary takes the novel back to the beginning.
