The laborious course of the supposed "mother of battles", that is to say the reform of pensions, makes unexpected winners.
The first is a ghost: the Senate, transcended by the effect of contrast with the "bordélisation" of the Palais Bourbon, the new beating heart of democracy.
Who would've believed that?
The second winner of the debate over the past two months is a dead man: it is the universal points plan project, presented and then buried during Emmanuel Macron's first five-year term.
Indeed, each hare raised in more or less good faith by the oppositions and each rectification made by the executive reveal the complexity, the illegibility, and therefore the inequity of the system, before and after reform.
The Micmac on long careers illustrates this confusion.
Behind the objective of raising the retirement age to 64 hide age limits at 58, 60, 62 and 63.
Read also Pension reform: in the Senate, five elected officials responsible for ensuring the serenity of the debates
Depending on whether you are a man or a woman, whether you will have started working sooner or later, whether you will have had…
This article is for subscribers only.
You have 80% left to discover.
Flash Sale -70%
Offer available until February 28.
Without engagement.
I ENJOY IT
Already subscribed?
Login
