Another resignation in the government - and there are also tensions surrounding the budget:
Meir Parosh of Torah Judaism informed Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu today (Tuesday) that he is leaving his position as the minister in charge of the Rabbi's revelry in Miron, due to allegations following the splitting of powers over the production of the event, attempts to thwart the project, and a lack of Responding to urgent needs The upcoming revelry In addition, "Israel Today" learned that he is considering resigning from his position altogether.
As a reminder, yesterday the Deputy Minister in the Ministry of Education Avi Maoz resigned from his position (Noam faction), as revealed in "Israel Hayom".
Sources close to him told "Israel Today": "The next step is to resign from the government. He became a minister because of Miron and this is the issue that is important to him. It is estimated that the next step is to retire from the government."
His associates also said: "We waited and waited and it exploded. Meir Forosh took Miron on him. But it turns out that "the Center for Holy Places stuck sticks in the wheels". Things related to production, construction and more. It is impossible for Forosh to be appointed and responsible and not be able to do anything."
Anger about the budget
In the meantime, Torah Judaism officials are threatening Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that they will not vote with the coalition, due to broken promises.
"They are underestimating and violating the coalition agreement", so they said today and this against the background of the approval of the state budget.
According to the same sources, promises that were agreed upon in the coalition negotiations have not been fulfilled, mainly around budgets for education and public transportation. As I recall, in "Yeded Na'aman" - the publication of the Torah Flag faction - it was published on Sunday morning about the dissatisfaction, and now the threat stage has responded.
"They think the coalition commitment is one-sided, so no," party officials said.
If there is no agreement, we are not committed to the coalition.
They have a majority even without us, let them enjoy.
We will not allow them to harm the ultra-orthodox public." .
.
.
were we wrong
We will fix it!
If you found an error in the article, we would appreciate it if you shared it with us