The Government has deepened its equivocal character in recent days, to define it in some way.
And along these lines, officials close to the President -there aren't many left- seem to have launched a strategy that emerged from the popular question about how to hide an elephant.
The answer is known: by surrounding him with many elephants.
Thus,
they decided to surround the statements of Alberto Fernández with definitions of a similar tenor.
No one more virtuous in this task than Aníbal Fernández.
Prodigal creator of gimmicky catchphrases, the minister tries to hide the inefficiency of the management with discursive provocation.
To his initial response of
“the drug traffickers won”
, he added this Wednesday the defiant
“we are going to get to the bone”
, when announcing the dispatch of security forces to Rosario.
A few hours later, in Congress, he launched
“I won't go back even under water”
.
And he assured that the narco triumph had been said
"with total bad temper, to draw attention to the issue."
The minister should know that nothing attracts more attention than 65 deaths in less than three months.
You can save the wits of him.
He was not the only one who brought elephants to the scene.
Gabriela Cerruti, always incontinent in her search for leadership, stated:
"The prisoners do not have telephones
. "
She forgot, among other things, that in 2021 "Guille" Cantero, leader of Los Monos, was found and had to disconnect a telephone line twice in his Marcos Paz prison cell.
However,
the saga reached lysergic peaks with the same actors.
It happened when Aníbal Fernández, less than 24 hours after his announcement in Rosario, backed away from the decision to send Army engineers:
"I have nothing to do with it
," he said, in the face of López Murphy's criticism.
"I am closer to thinking like you"
, surprised the opposition deputy, who questioned the sending of troops without weapons.
The following nonsense was carried out, again, by the spokeswoman.
“The president is a Kirchnerist,”
he said, to deny the alleged statement by Alberto Fernández himself (Chief of the Cabinet of Néstor Kirchner and Cristina, and her running mate and elected president) that “he was going to end 20 years
of Kirchnerism ”.
Not even Mel Brooks (sorry millennials) was encouraged to do so much.
And Cristina Kirchner?
In an already well-known conceptual acrobatics, she insisted yesterday in Río Negro with the idea of banning her and chicaned the President by assuring that she can show her cell phone, and by mentioning once again the things that are said off-screen.
She showed her opinion of Alberto Fernández in what was not said: she mentioned "Máximo and Sergio"
(Massa) and Wado de Pedro by his names
, and distanced Fernández as
"the president".
She did, however, have a moment of realism by admitting 100% inflation in the last twelve months.
Crisis from which she tried to "unmark herself", describing the supposed benefits of the economy in his presidency.
The sequence is only descriptive.
It reflects a government that, powerless to change reality, seeks solace in exercises in illusion.
/cloudfront-eu-central-1.images.arcpublishing.com/prisa/J4I2H7Y2YFJ3I34HVXKR2WHXPQ.jpg)
