Naëm Bestandji is a writer. A committed feminist and secularist, he is the author of a remarkable essay,
Le shroud of feminism-Caressing Islamism in the sense of the veil
(Séramis editions, 2021).
The UN has chosen March 21 as the “International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination”.
The City of Grenoble is taking part in this with a poster campaign.
But, rather than investing himself fully in it, the mayor decided to use it to relay the marketing of political Islamism.
Among the posters that show the ethnic diversity of our country and the discrimination that a person can suffer because of their origin, the City exhibits on several City billboards the photo of a veiled woman.
Superimposed is the inscription "Grenoble is committed against racism" and "I have two times less chance of obtaining a job interview".
For several years, the mayor of Grenoble, Éric Piolle, has drifted towards supporting political Islamism.
This is perhaps helped by his sexist and patriarchal view of women.
He sees no problem with the sexual objectification of their body, therefore with its concealment in order to appease the male libido.
The sexism of the veil being the patriarchal and political tool of Islamism, their paths could only cross.
Zealous, Éric Piolle then takes up all the rhetoric of the Muslim Brotherhood.
We find, in this campaign against racial discrimination, its alignment in the communication of political Islamism.
He picks up the codes.
Having "half the chance of getting a job interview" is not attributable to employers but testifies to the intransigence and psychological inability to remove the veil.
Naem Bestandji
The first step is to integrate one or two veiled women among other people.
Staging only veiled women would be perceived as a flagrant proselytizing offensive.
Including only one or two will be felt as a form of diversity.
The second step, the most important, is to turn away from the field concerned with the veil (gender inequality) to go to those of religious freedom and anti-racism, without fear of the contradiction that may arise.
Read alsoPierre Vermeren: “Political Islam in France, what we stubbornly refuse to see”
Having "half the chance of getting a job interview" is not attributable to employers but testifies to the intransigence and psychological inability to remove the veil.
It is not the employer who discriminates but the candidate who discriminates against herself.
First by wearing a symbol that marks discrimination by sex, the inferiorization of women compared to men.
Then because the candidate wears a sign that she declares to be "religious", while no other candidate of any other religion wears such a sign.
The neutrality demanded by employers is not discrimination but, on the contrary, equal treatment.
Claiming a privilege denied to all others: discrimination is also here.
To circumvent this obviousness,
the City of Grenoble resumes the diversion of political Islamism by going into the field of racial discrimination.
Partner of this retrograde and totalitarian ideology, the City makes adhesion to a religious radicalism a “race”.
It thus maintains the confusion between "Maghreb" and "Muslim" and between "Muslim" and veil.
To be a Muslim would no longer be a religious choice but an ethnic heredity.
Freedom of conscience is obsolete.
The City of Grenoble and its mayor mark their rejection of secularism… but only for Muslim women.
Thus, the sexism of the veil would no longer be a matter of patriarchy but of biology, therefore impossible to remove.
This is how to reverse values and accuse of racism any opposition to the proselytism of an ideology.
For the City of Grenoble, it is the opposition to this sexist discrimination, or the treatment of this accessory on an equal basis with all the others, which would be "racial discrimination".
It is the rhetoric of inversion conceptualized by Islamism to serve the victim strategy.
Naem Bestandji
If the form is a first, the idea is not new for the mayor.
He had made the incredible demonstration of it to defend the authorization of the sexism of the burqini in the municipal swimming pools of his city.
For this, he was helped by one of the most sexist and retrograde associations in France, which ensures the junction between the far left and Islamism, at the origin of the burqini actions: Citizen Alliance.
He also pays tribute to this association with a wink in his tweet which informs about this campaign: "
We support associations that fight against discrimination and for equal access to housing, employment, respect
.”
Read alsoIn Brussels, the holy alliance between Wokism and Islamism
The City of Grenoble endorses the communication of political Islamism by using, like the latter, the sexism of the veil as a proselytizing and political tool, as well as the victimizing diversion of anti-racism by the biological assignment of "Muslim women" to the sail.
The CCIE (the CCIF dissolved in France and reconstituted in Belgium) is grateful to him.
This association is ideologically a legal branch of the Muslim Brotherhood.
In a tweet, the Islamists of the CCIE publicly congratulate the City of Grenoble: “
A new campaign by @VilledeGrenoble (South East) to fight against racism.
Thank you @VilledeGrenoble for including Muslim women in your campaigns
".
It is indeed "Muslim women" to assign them all to the veiling of their being.
Muslim women who are not veiled would not be Muslim enough, or not at all.
This is what the City of Grenoble and its mayor are involved in.
The veil, a political tool, is sexually discriminatory.
The veiled woman would be of “Muslim race”.
Thus, for the City of Grenoble, it is the opposition to this sexist discrimination, or the treatment of this accessory on an equal basis with all the others, which would be "racial discrimination".
It is the rhetoric of inversion conceptualized by Islamism to serve the victim strategy.
The message of the “International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination” is scrambled to serve a totalitarian ideology.
And all this with the money of the Grenoble taxpayers.
