The Constitutional Council will play politics in spite of itself.
With some pressure in this flammable context.
The pension reform makes this supreme court the arbiter of one of the most serious political crises since the "yellow vests".
It must, by April 18, analyze four referrals.
First, that of the Prime Minister, Élisabeth Borne, a "white referral" on "
the conformity of the text with the Constitution
" in its entirety.
Then those of the deputies of the Nupes, the National Rally and the left-wing parties of the Senate.
At the center of the reflection of the constitutional judges: a possible diversion of procedure to pass the text of the pensions in urgency, the sincerity and the clarity of the debates, abused by the accumulation of the tools of constraint of the parliamentarians and, finally, the use of "social riders".
At the end of the road, three solutions: validation of the text without blinking, partial censorship or total censorship.
The Sages must also...
This article is for subscribers only.
You have 85% left to discover.
Want to read more?
Unlock all items immediately.
TEST FOR €0.99