The bastard's daughter, the little disengagement plan from northern Samaria, unlike her older sister – the expulsion of Gush Katif – was born in Washington. The outrageous uprooting of Gush Katif, glorifying Jewish settlement in the modern Return to Zion, was conceived by Ariel Sharon and his people. One day it will be necessary to investigate why they did this. The casual and casual uprooting of northern Samaria settlements, including Homesh, was conceived in Washington by Condoleezza Rice and members of the US State Department.
Exposure in "Israel Hayom", 18.05.2023,
It is very worth remembering this, against the backdrop of the sullen condemnation issued over the weekend by the US Embassy in Israel of the order allowing Jews to stay in Homesh. A direct continuation of the public rebuke of our ambassador in Washington and President Biden's definition of the amendment to the Disengagement Law as a "particularly provocative move." It is very worthwhile to recall how that move in northern Samaria was initiated and what his motives were. Perhaps then they will classify the current provocative American outrage as "sin on crime" syndrome and get a little less excited about it.
The uprooting of northern Samaria was conceived in Washington by Condoleezza Rice and members of the US State Department. Rice, photo: Yossi Zeliger
Condoleezza Rice, who served as President Bush's national security adviser during the disengagement, demanded "proof of seriousness" from Sharon in the Judea and Samaria sector as well. Dubi Weisglass, who ran Prime Minister Sharon's office and pushed with all his might for the "disengagement," once told me how northern Samaria was incorporated into the plan: "The Americans were on the verge of issuing a letter with de facto recognition of the settlement blocs in Judea and Samaria and a declaration that refugees would not return to Israel. At the same time, they demanded that no appearance be created that Israel was sacrificing Gaza in order to save Judea and Samaria and remain there. The exit from Gaza and the evacuation of Gush Katif and northern Gaza were not perceived by the Bush administration as a big enough victim."
Letter without cover
Giora Eiland, then head of the National Security Council, was therefore compelled, without great joy, to draw the map of the evacuation from northern Samaria. Yair Naveh, then the head of the Central Command, carried out the evacuation order as if he were a demon. Both believed that the evacuation was carried out "for nothing," and that the IDF remained in the area.
Thus, Israel was forced to offer another sacrifice to the "golden calf" of the disengagement from Katif, and the logger exceeded four Jewish communities in northern Samaria as well.
We have been eating the fruits of the two "disengagements" since year after year, or as the law to cancel the disengagement that the Knesset approved two months ago put it: "Since none of the purposes of the disengagement plan has been realized, and because instead of benefit, it has caused enormous damage, the understanding of the injustice done to civilians whose evacuation and displacement was authorized by law becomes clearer. Therefore, the bill proposes to cancel parts of the Disengagement Plan Implementation Law, thereby erasing to some extent the national and moral stain that it has stained on the State of Israel's daily garment."
The presidential letter that allegedly recognized the large settlement blocs in Judea and Samaria turned out to be "expired" faster than expected. George W. Bush, photo: AFP
Even the American "exchange" for the disengagement now validates the decision to allow the Jews to return to Homesh. Bush's presidential letter, which allegedly recognized the large settlement blocs in Judea and Samaria, turned out to be "expired" faster than expected. The Obama administration has denied it, just as the Biden administration today denies it. How did Hillary Clinton tell Netanyahu? – "Lumps or no lumps. Not a single stone." So now, when we finally return to the Pentateuch, we have to remember who took us out of there.
Wrong? We'll fix it! If you find a mistake in the article, please share with us