The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Cristina Kirchner questioned the decision to close the investigation into the attack against her: 'They want me imprisoned or dead'

2023-05-29T21:30:40.567Z

Highlights: The vice president uploaded a text to Twitter after the decision of prosecutor Carlos Rívolo to request the elevation to trial of the accused. He targeted him and Judge Maria Eugenia Capuchetti. "For CFK there is and will not be justice, neither as a defendant nor as a victim. They want me imprisoned or dead," Kirchner said in the text. "There is no clearer practice to seek impunity for complex cases than to break them into pieces," she added.


The vice president uploaded a text to Twitter after the decision of prosecutor Carlos Rívolo to request the elevation to trial of the accused. He targeted him and Judge Maria Eugenia Capuchetti.


Cristina Kirchner pointed out CarlosRívolo in a publication on her social networks on Monday. After the decision of the prosecutor investigating the case of the attack against the vice president on September 1 to request the elevation to trial of those accused of perpetrating it, the answer came. "They want me imprisoned or dead," he launched in a libel that he headed with the photos of the prosecutor and the judge of the case, María Eugenia Capuchetti, whom he placed in his so-called "Judicial Party" and as guilty of "the consecration of impunity."

The vice president concluded the publication uploaded on her website by talking about herself in the third person. "For CFK there is and will not be justice, neither as a defendant nor as a victim. They want me imprisoned or dead."


Cristina Kirchner's text against the prosecutor and the judge of the attack

In a new act of consecration of impunity, prosecutor Rívolo closed the investigation of the attempted murder that I suffered on September 1 of last year and requested the elevation to trial of the case only with respect to Brenda Uliarte, Fernando Sabag Montiel and Gabriel Nicolás Carrizo.

In his opinion, the prosecutor completely omits to assess everything related to the lines of investigation that point to people who go beyond Uliarte, Sabag Montiel and Carrizo.

As I have said, there is no clearer practice to seek impunity for complex cases than to break them into pieces. What remains is never investigated again. And Commodore Py has a sorry record in that regard.

I said it a thousand times: neither Capuchetti nor Rívolo wanted to investigate the assassination attempt and now they intend to close the investigation with a speed that they never demonstrated in any case.

Rívolo mentions the evidence produced in relation to the Millman line, but does not devote a single word to weighing its importance to the cause. It does not even mention the recent statement of Ivana Bohdziewicz, Millman's former adviser, in which she told how she was taken to delete her cell phone at the offices of Patricia Bullrich, on Av. De Mayo.

Curiously, this fact is the only "forgetfulness" of Rívolo when reviewing the testimonies provided in the case. As is public knowledge, all the evidence produced in connection with Millman's involvement has proved incriminating.

The entire investigation was characterized by avoiding knowing the truth. It is plagued by witnesses who erased their phones, evidence that it was destroyed without investigating its causes and motivations, and an obvious and desperate attempt to avoid finding the possible involvement of third parties, financiers and instigators.

All this, without prejudice to the fact that in another investigation inexplicably separate from that of the attack, there are unjustified payments from the Caputo family and possible money laundering around characters related to the attack, along with countless indications pending investigation that show a link between violent pseudo-political groups and the perpetrators of the attack.

Regarding the accused Carrizo, who has messages such as "now we are going to kill the head of the Cámpora" and makes constant allusions to a high level of organization of the attack, Rívolo considers that his only intervention was to grant a weapon that was not used.

In addition, the prosecutor does not express himself in the slightest regarding the deletion of Sabag Montiel's cell phone, whose content was lost on the day of the assassination attempt with a negligent intervention of the judge.

This is linked to the fact that Rívolo does not express himself with respect to the measures of proof pending production, which make it inadmissible to raise the case to trial.

All this, among dozens of other pieces of evidence that the lawsuit that I exercise detailed and required incessantly, and particularly when opposing the elevation to trial. It is not understood how or why Rívolo intends to close a case in full process, in which, necessarily, the responsibility of the material authors is tied to that of any person who has collaborated from "behind".

From day one until today, the judicial authorities have put one obstacle after another to prevent the truth of what happened on September 1, 2022 from coming to light.

As I said, for CFK there is not and will not be justice, neither as accused nor as victim. They want me imprisoned or dead.

News in development.

DS

See also

The prosecutor asked that those responsible for the attack on Cristina Kirchner go to oral trial

The imaginary clue of the attack of Los Copitos to Cristina Kirchner

Source: clarin

All news articles on 2023-05-29

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.