Maintaining confusion remains a weapon of communication. And in this long, too long end of the soap opera of the pension reform, the left uses and abuses it. With the kind participation of Charles de Courson and his group Liot, which, from an initial centrist tone, has become a guarantor of respectability of the "brothelization" desired by the Nupes.
Thus, to hear the left, the invocation of Article 40 of the Constitution would only be the expression of a coup de force flouting the rights of Parliament and silencing the opposition. As a kind of replica of section 49.3, by which the government finally succeeded in passing its law raising the legal retirement age to 64. Except that these two articles are not of the same nature. The 49.3 is a possible weapon while the 40 is a mandatory tool. On the Dussopt law, the government could have risked going as far as a vote. On the PPL Courson, it is just impossible to increase public spending...
This article is for subscribers only. You still have 69% to discover.
Want to read more?
Unblock all items immediately.
TEST FOR 0,99€
Already a subscriber? Log
