The former head of mission of the Elysée Alexandre Benalla kept a low profile at the opening Friday, June 9 in Paris of his appeal trial for the violence of May 1, 2018, acknowledging some of the facts of which he is accused.
«
I probably made many mistakes in my defense, "said at the bar the former collaborator of Emmanuel Macron, now 31 years old, pleading "errors of youth", even if he understands that it could have been "perceived as provocations".
Alexandre Benalla, in a gray suit, short beard and square glasses, is retried for molesting five people while trying to arrest them on the sidelines of the May 1, 2018 demonstration in Paris, wearing a police helmet, while he attended the parade only as an "observer".
'Nonsense'
He is also accused of having transmitted CCTV images illegally obtained from the police, of having continued to travel with diplomatic passports after his dismissal from the Elysee, of having obtained a service passport thanks to a false document and of having illegally carried a handgun in 2017. The "Benallagate" had broken out on July 18, 2018, after his identification on a video where he brutalized a couple place de la Contrescarpe, in Paris, and the many twists of the case had poisoned the beginning of the first term of Emmanuel Macron.
At the trial of first instance, in September 2021, Alexandra Benalla had challenged foot by foot all these grievances, recognizing only a "stupidity" concerning diplomatic passports. The criminal court had sentenced him to three years in prison, including one year in prison, under electronic bracelet, describing his explanations as "absurd and irresponsible". Change of tone before the Court of Appeal: the defendant made an act of contrition, apologizing to those affected by his actions, and admitted all offenses except violence in assembly and interference in a public function.
I thought I was acting within the law.
Alexandre Benalla
«
By transmitting a signed note" on the letterhead of the chief of staff of the Elysée at the time, François-Xavier Lauch, "without his agreement", to request a service passport, "I recognize that I committed a forgery," he said. At the first trial, he denied any "fraudulent intent" and assured that he had "done things properly". The defendant also acknowledged that he should not have released the CCTV images, which he hoped to use to exonerate himself, and considered that he had "lost all credibility" by claiming during the investigation that the weapon displayed in a photo in 2017 was "a water gun".
On the other hand, "I maintain my appeal with regard to intentional violence and interference in public office. As I have always said, I believed I was acting within the framework of the law," added Alexandre Benalla. The Court of Appeal, however, will examine all the alleged facts and can "maintain, reduce or increase the penalties," said the president. Asked about his situation, Alexandre Benalla explained that he had lived in Switzerland for two years, with his wife and two children, and worked as an "advisor to the president" of a small NGO, the World Organization for Resilience and Crisis Management.
" READ ALSO Alexandre Benalla, this "without rank" who was authoritative
It was a danger that had no place to be.
Vincent Crase, co-defendant
His co-defendant Vincent Crase, 50, a former reservist in the national gendarmerie, also limited the disputed facts to violence in assembly and interference in a public function. In particular, he admitted to carrying a weapon prohibited for having taken away on the day of the demonstration a handgun normally kept in a safe at the headquarters of La République en Marche, the presidential party now renamed Renaissance. "It was an endangerment that had no place to be," he said.
With short hair and black shirt, the long-time friend of Alexandre Benalla said he was "unemployed" and lives in Senegal, where he was until recently an executive of a private security company. The Court of Appeal will also rule on July 6 on the transmission of a priority question of constitutionality presented at the beginning of the hearing by the defense of Vincent Crase, who argues that the definition of the offense of "interference in a public function" is not sufficiently precise. The trial is scheduled to last until June 16.
