The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Diesel lawsuit against Mercedes: decision planned for March

2023-09-21T14:36:32.383Z

Highlights: Consumer advocates want to claim damages for a good 2800 Mercedes customers. The Federation of German Consumer Organizations filed the model declaratory action in connection with the diesel scandal. The trial had been postponed several times after it began in the summer of 2022. If the more than 2800 car owners who have joined the lawsuit were to be granted a right to compensation, they would still have to enforce it themselves.. Status: 21.09.2023, 16:30 p.m.



Status: 21.09.2023, 16:30 p.m.

CommentsShare

The Mercedes star on the building of the former headquarters of the automotive group in Stuttgart. © Bernd Weißbrod/dpa/Archivbild

In the wake of the diesel scandal, consumer advocates want to claim damages for a good 2800 Mercedes customers. More than a year after the start of the trial, it is now clear when the decision will be made.

Stuttgart - A decision is to be made next spring in the trial of a model declaratory action brought by consumer advocates against Mercedes-Benz. On Thursday, the Stuttgart Higher Regional Court (OLG) set March 28, 2024 as the pronouncement date. Previously, the 24th Civil Senate had negotiated for about three hours. Among other things, technical details of the affected vehicles and the current case law of the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) were discussed.

In 2021, the Federation of German Consumer Organizations filed the model declaratory action in connection with the diesel scandal. In essence, the association accuses the Stuttgart-based carmaker of deliberately manipulating exhaust gas values and wants to claim damages for affected customers. If the more than 2800 car owners who have joined the lawsuit were to be granted a right to compensation, they would still have to enforce it themselves.

The presiding judge Thilo Rebmann had hinted during the session on Thursday that he tended to follow the argumentation of the plaintiff side on several points - including the question of whether the specific cases were defeat devices and whether they were inadmissible or not.

However, some questions were still unanswered, on which the carmaker's lawyers are expected to comment in the coming months. A spokesman for the company said after the hearing: "We will continue to bring our arguments into the proceedings in order to answer the open questions to the satisfaction of the Senate". In addition, one welcomes the fact that the Senate deals extensively with technical issues.

The trial had been postponed several times after it began in the summer of 2022. The reason for this was expected fundamental decisions in the complex. In March, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) had shaken up the previous BGH case law in the wake of the diesel scandal and significantly lowered the hurdles for claims for damages.

In doing so, the Luxembourg judges had forced the diesel senate in Karlsruhe to take a step towards consumers in Germany. Since a ruling by the federal judges in June, they can now have reasonable hopes for compensation if illegal defeat devices for exhaust gas purification are installed in their cars. Dpa

Source: merkur

All news articles on 2023-09-21

You may like

News/Politics 2023-09-27T15:41:38.495Z
News/Politics 2023-06-26T13:56:59.673Z
News/Politics 2023-06-26T11:07:42.119Z
News/Politics 2023-06-26T11:08:15.126Z

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.