As of: January 30, 2024, 2:10 p.m
By: Bernhard Jepsen
Comments
Press
Split
First plan: Instead of the old commercial building, three residential complexes could be built at Robert-Koch-Straße 14.
© Architectural firm Hörner&Partner
On Robert-Koch-Straße in Peißenberg, 42 apartments could replace a commercial business.
The building committee discussed an application for this.
Peißenberg - It would be a larger-scale residential building project: According to this, 42 residential units are to be built on the property at Robert-Koch-Straße 14, divided into three building complexes - instead of the company's "Griesbeck Formenbau" site.
The Peißenberg building committee has already dealt with an application for a preliminary ruling.
Application in the Peißenberg building committee: 42 apartments on company premises on Robert-Koch-Straße?
The outdated, single-storey flat-roof building in which the “Griesbeck” company (including tool making and water jet cutting work) is located does not give the area on Robert-Koch-Straße a particularly attractive look.
But there are plans for a different urban development use: At the most recent meeting of the municipal building committee, designs from the Schongau architectural firm “Hörner & Partner” for a larger residential building project were presented.
On the agenda was an application for a preliminary decision with ten individual questions - including the number of floor areas, the permissible wall height and the integration into the built environment.
The plans envisage three individual buildings, each with a floor area of 335 square meters, three full floors and set-back staggered floors.
The ridge height is 12.50 meters.
As the town hall administration said in the committee, the height level could certainly be classified as permissible in the context of the adjacent residential complexes to the south.
At least the district office signaled the green light in a preliminary statement in this regard.
The still existing company location of the “Griesbeck” company.
© Jepsen
The scope and height of the planned development was controversially debated in the committee.
“In principle, I have no problems with converting the commercial space into residential use,” explained Bernd Schewe (SPD) – but: “I have a hard time orienting myself on the large blocks in the south.” This would mean “three giant blocks” on the property. arise that would have a negative impact on the visual impact of the otherwise rather low houses in the area on Robert-Kochs-Straße.
My news
Guard meeting in Peißenberg was a complete success
Sobering results on the topic of “transport transition” at the Green Party’s New Year’s reception
Family dispute in Weilheim escalates: mother wants to attack her children with a beer mug - police have to intervene
Murnau Volunteer Fire Department: After Michael Montag resigned, Hans Jais is now at the helm
Festival host and showman for Weilheimer Wiesn foundread
A clear opinion at the SPD New Year's reception on the federal government's balance sheet and "traffic light" bashing
“I would like to see a smoother transition,” says Schewe.
But the applicant is probably interested in “maximizing development”.
Anton Höck (Peißenberger Liste) made a similar statement: “It doesn’t fit into the environment.
It's just too much.
You should leave the church in the village.”
Höck also did not like the concept with four “full floors” without a gable roof - in complete contrast to Jürgen Forstner (Free Voters): The drafts presented were coherent.
There is always talk of compaction and avoiding land erosion.
The plans would create more living space thanks to the flat roof shape and the recessed floor.
A gable roof is much less effective in this regard: “Yes, that’s true.
“That’s how we build things these days,” emphasized Forstner in the direction of Höck.
Matthias Bichlmayr (Greens) was also able to get used to the plans: “Before building in the area, it’s better to build higher.”
Ultimately, the committee decided with a narrow majority (6:5 votes) that the “intended level of structural use” with floor area and floor area number could be approved.
The integration into the urban surroundings was also approved.
However, the committee insisted on compliance with the municipal parking regulations.
The question as to whether a deviation from the regulations with two parking spaces per residential unit over 50 square meters instead of 35 square meters was possible was answered with “no”.