The Federal Administrative Litigation Chamber
rejected two appeals
from entities that requested to suspend and then declare unconstitutional mega DNU number 70
in its entirety
by confirming rulings by court judge Enrique Lavié Pico, which represents a relief for the Government.
This good news for Javier Milei's government was known after the Labor Chamber declared
only
the labor chapter of that controversial DNU unconstitutional.
Firstly, the Chamber of Federal Administrative Litigation court, made up of judges Sergio Fernández and Carlos Grecco,
dismissed the appeal filed by Jorge Rizzo in his capacity as President of the Civil Association Gente de Derecho
with the payment of the costs for the plaintiff.
The government's defense in both cases was led by the Treasury Attorney General, Rodolfo Barra.
In the foundations of the ruling, the court ratified the rejection of the amparo action “on the basis that
the existence of a “cause”, “case” or “controversy” that corresponds to the Judiciary of the Nation resolve in the terms of article 116 of the National Constitution
.”
On the other hand, the same courtroom of this court recalled that Judge Lavié Pico decided to reject the present amparo action, with costs against the Civil Association Observatory of the Right to the City, through its President, and Claudio Raúl Lozano (former official K), Hugo Ernesto Godoy (head of the CTA) and Rodolfo Ariel Aguiar, in their capacity as members of the entity.
This is the first precautionary measure presented against the DNU
Faced with this appeal, the court decided to “
dismiss
the appeal filed by the plaintiff and, consequently, confirm the first instance ruling in that it rejected – with costs – this amparo action.”
It was based on “that the existence of a “cause”, “case” or “controversy” that corresponds to the Judicial Power of the Nation to resolve in the terms of Article 116 of the National Constitution is not established – in the present – .
He also charged the plaintiff with the costs of the trial.