Cristina Kirchner
re-establishes herself on the political scene but, as she revealed, without the intention of being the first protagonist.
She met these days with close leaders and left a message to her deputies at a time when the Omnibus Law was being discussed: "Don't do anti-mileism
.
"
Wink for the President?
Their troops assured
Clarín
that the former president's request did not come as a surprise, knowing the vicissitudes that Kirchnerism faced and still suffers from not getting support from other sectors, partly a consequence of its
own management in Congress
- without dialogue or consensus. when it had the majority.
But this was not the only message that the former president left her deputies.
He also spoke about Javier Milei's controversial statements when he declared that they asked him for bribes for the megaproject.
"Milei may be criticized for his economic policy, but he did not lie," the former President said one word more, one word less, according to an important deputy.
What he did not clarify is who the suspicion falls on.
Is the focus on the deputies or the political operators?
Maybe they are those interested in state-owned companies that Milei wants to privatize?
The parliamentary source left the issue to free interpretation.
These statements are known on the same day that, it is assumed, the State Reform Law sent by the Executive will finally be voted on in general (what remains).
Could Cristina's wink imply some type of parliamentary support from the 99 deputies of Unión por la Patria?
On the bench they assure that no, that they will vote against in general and in particular, as has been expressed in the speeches.
Yes, it is speculated that the tones of those speeches could be lowered a little and perhaps the tension that K groups incite in the street.
Together with leftist groups, they demonstrated directly demanding that the session be lowered.
The information is also known when certain sectors talk about an alleged unwritten pact between the libertarian and the former president, so as not to harass her with judicial issues linked to corruption.
Several voices have already come out from the Government to reject this speculation.