The decision of the Constitutional Council of January 25 on the immigration law, like those of the European Court of Human Rights and the Council of State on the expulsion of an apprentice Uzbek terrorist, has once again fueled the debate on judicial activism and the “government of judges”.
According to the little game that has become routine, the members of the criticized jurisdictions and their idolatrous supporters obviously cry out for the calling into question of the “rule of law” and the alleged contempt for institutions.
These outraged groans are in complete bad faith.
The hypocritical denial of excess jurisdictional power exasperates citizens who, even if they do not master the mysteries of our legal system, see with their own eyes that the representatives they elect are reduced to impotence by lying arguments. whose sole aim is to gag democracy, refuse the verdict of the ballot boxes and precisely call into question the balance of powers desired by...
This article is reserved for subscribers.
You have 86% left to discover.
Flash sale
-70% on digital subscription
I ENJOY IT
Already subscribed?
Log in