As of: February 6, 2024, 3:00 p.m
Comments
Press
Split
The expansion plans of the Agrobs company are once again on the agenda of the Münsingen municipal council.
© sh/Archive
The feed manufacturer Agrobs is once again causing controversy.
The expansion plans end up back on the tables of the local council in Münsing.
Münsing
- The district office once again has a different opinion than the municipality when it comes to Agrobs' expansion plans.
For this reason, the local council must decide again at its meeting this Tuesday - starting at 7.30 p.m. in the town hall - on two building applications from the feed manufacturer for two additional halls on the company premises at Angerbreite, which it had already rejected in August last year.
The council issued a ban on changes last year
As reported, the council issued a so-called change ban, i.e. a temporary construction ban, and decided to draw up a development plan that regulates development in the landscape-sensitive area.
The expansion cannot be completely banned, as the manufacturing process of the feed cops for horses is dust-intensive and therefore cannot simply take place in a commercial area.
“The local council will hopefully follow our recommendation and continue not to grant consent,” explains Mayor Michael Grasl (Free Voters) when asked by our newspaper.
If the district office still approves halls six and seven, the municipality will consider filing a lawsuit.
“This is about the curtailment of our planning sovereignty, which at least I will not accept,” Grasl makes clear.
The same applies to the clear majority of the local council, even if some members have changed their mind.
You can read the latest news from Münsing here.
On Tuesday, the committee discussed the issue together with a specialist lawyer in an internal construction committee.
Internally, in order to be able to exclude Agrobs managing director Simon Berger, a local councilor but not a member of the building committee.
In a letter dated February 17th, the district office took the view that the municipality had unlawfully refused consent.
The district office sees no public concerns that would speak against granting an exception.
The planned construction project would have corresponded to the development plan that was being drawn up.
The first draft of the development plan is to be presented in the spring
But the district office does not yet know the development plan.
A first draft is to be presented in the spring.
Then the public process can begin and everyone involved can have their say, says Grasl.
He is responding to the East Bank Protection Association, which considers citizen participation to be absolutely necessary.
“We want to control, weigh things up and enter into a dialogue with the company.
This is only possible if the municipality is the sponsor and client of the process.”
By Tanja Lühr
Our Wolfratshausen-Geretsried newsletter regularly informs you about all important stories from your region. Sign up here.