The President's Office
made a strong publication on social networks after midnight this Tuesday where
it divided the deputies who "voted for and against the people"
during the debate in particular of the Omnibus Law.
In the second group appeared Javier Milei's former candidate for the governorship of the province of Buenos Aires,
Carolina Píparo, who came out to justify her vote
for her.
The official message began by thanking "the legislative commitment of the PRO Front bloc, headed by
Cristian Ritondo
, the deputy
Miguel Ángel Pichetto
and the UCR sector that accompanied the project, as well as that of all the deputies who this Tuesday voted in favor in particular of the 'Law of Bases and Starting Points for the Freedom of Argentines'”.
Immediately afterwards, he highlighted "
the betrayal
of his voters by all the blocks that turned their backs on his campaign promises for a different Argentina."
"The people will never forget the names of those who, being able to facilitate the reforms that were elected by 56 percent of Argentines,
decided to continue playing into the hands of caste
," he continued.
The Office of the President appreciates the legislative commitment of the Frente PRO bloc, headed by Cristian Ritondo, of the deputy Miguel Ángel Pichetto, and of the UCR sector that accompanied the project, as well as all the deputies who this Tuesday voted in favor in particular...
— Office of the President (@OPRArgentina) February 7, 2024
In the rest of the post, he made a list of the legislators who "voted for the people" and those who "voted against the people."
In that second list he included Píparo and her blockmate,
Lorena Macyszyn
, who only cast one negative vote, and also
Martín Tetaz
, who voted against on three occasions.
Specifically,
both Píparo and Tetaz only opposed section H of article 4, which deals with the powers delegated to Javier Milei
.
The subsection enables the Executive Branch to "transform, modify, unify or eliminate trusts or public trust funds created by regulations with legal status, including those intended for subsidies, review their origin and destination to achieve greater rationality, efficiency, effectiveness, transparency and control of the use of public resources".
The radical also voted against sections E and F of article 5.
Píparo's justification and Tetaz's anger
Carolina Piparo received a strong attack on social networks, especially from libertarian militants.
In the same way,
he justified his negative vote
: "The Buenos Aires Libre bloc voted in favor of all emergencies and all delegated powers requested by the executive branch. The only negative vote was for one section, section H of article 4 (composed of eight clauses)".
The Buenos Aires Libre bloc voted in favor of all emergencies and all delegated powers requested by the executive branch.
The only negative vote was for ONE SUBSECTION, subsection H of article 4 (made up of eight subsections).
Specifically, we voted against a…
— Carolina Piparo (@CarolinaPiparo) February 7, 2024
"
Specifically, we voted against a modification proposed by another bloc on trusts
. We wish the government temperance to bring peace of mind to the Argentines who have had such a hard time for so long. Thanks to the media for the invitations and the usual interest, but "This time I have nothing more to add," he said.
Another of the most criticized legislators was
Tetaz
, who asked that they "stop lying to the people" and showed "all the votes, point by point of each deputy."
"I voted 90% of the articles in favor
," he remarked.
This regrettable and fascist statement only confirms that the government was never interested in the Law being passed and has no interest in it being discussed in committee.
Unfortunately the Argentines lose
PS: In my particular case I signed the majority opinion, I voted in favor in… https://t.co/XdGETgaosZ
— The forces of the Constitution (@martintetaz) February 7, 2024
After the harsh tweet from the President's Office, he attacked: "
This regrettable and fascist statement
only confirms that the government was never interested in the Law being passed and has no interest in it being discussed in committee. Unfortunately, the Argentines lose. PS: In In my particular case, I signed the majority opinion, I voted in favor in general and I voted in favor of 90% of the articles in particular.
IS