The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Seven and a half years in prison for two jihadists accused of forming a “front” in Spanish prisons

2024-02-13T13:00:05.194Z

Highlights: Mohamed El Gharbi and Karim Abdeselam sentenced to seven and a half years in prison. Sentenced for sending letters to prisoners convicted of jihadism with the aim of keeping them united. Sentence represents another chapter in an intricate judicial case. The two convicted and the acquitted one already sat on the bench alongside Abderrahmanen Tahiri and Lahcen Zamzami, accused of forming the jihadist “prison front” But, before hearing took place, Tahiri vanished and the new court acquitted the third accused.


The National Court condemns Mohamed El Gharbi and Karim Abdeselam after acquitting them twice for the same facts


Facade of the National Court, in an image captured in 2023.Samuel Sánchez

The National Court has sentenced Mohamed El Gharbi and Karim Abdeselam to seven and a half years in prison for sending letters to prisoners convicted of jihadism with the aim of keeping them united, while they themselves were serving prison sentences for terrorism crimes.

After acquitting them on two previous occasions for the same facts, the court finally ruled this Monday that both were part of the so-called "prison front", a group of "radical Muslim" inmates who carried out "proselytism" work within the centers. prisons so that the Islamist inmates would not abandon the extremist “ideology” and “continue with the fight once released.”

As detailed in the resolution of the magistrates, between 2014 and 2019, while they were serving sentences in Spanish prisons for crimes of belonging to a terrorist organization, El Gharbi and Karim Abdeselam decided—along with Abderrahmanen Tahiri, also known as Mohamed Achraf, who is on the run from justice—“to unite the inmates imprisoned for crimes related to jihadist terrorism and lead them so that they do not abandon said ideology.”

To do this, they devised a system of mutual support “by sending letters containing flags and emblems of the terrorist organization Daesh;

as well as

nasheeds

(chantments used by jihadist terrorist organizations to encourage and praise the actions of combatants and militants);

and religious texts, to which they gave the rigorous interpretation that was convenient for their purposes.”

The judges conclude that their objective was “to form a compact group that would fight for Islamic terrorism, in any form and place, both inside and outside prison.”

Furthermore, according to the sentence, the accused also decided "not to limit their action to those convicted of crimes linked to jihadist terrorism", but also to "instruct, radicalize and attract" new followers to their "violent ideology" through "the creation and dissemination of messages and slogans related to the postulates of the terrorist organization.”

More information

The National Court orders to repeat the trial against an alleged jihadist front created in prisons

The Court finds Mohamed El Gharbi and Karim Abdeselam guilty of the crime of terrorist recruitment and indoctrination.

A third defendant, Abdelah Abdeselam Ahmed, has been acquitted: “Since the letters he sent to other inmates contained belligerent and rigorous content from a religious and ideological perspective, but did not include slogans, emblems or drawings of the terrorist organization Daesh that allow to affirm, without any hint of doubt, that he wanted to instruct other inmates in order to carry out acts of a terrorist nature,” the court explains.

This sentence represents another chapter in an intricate judicial case.

The two convicted this Monday (Mohamed El Gharbi and Karim Abdeselam) and the acquitted one (Abdelah Abdeselam Ahmed) already sat in July 2022 on the bench alongside Abderrahmanen Tahiri and Lahcen Zamzami, accused of forming the jihadist “prison front.”

During the hearing, the parties withdrew the accusation against Zamzami, and the court – made up of judges Teresa Palacios, Carmen Paloma González and Juan Francisco Martel – acquitted the rest by concluding that their letters did not urge the commission of “terrorist actions.”

However, the Appeals Chamber of the Court annulled that ruling and ordered the court of first instance to issue a new resolution, since there were “contradictions between the proven facts and the legal classification.”

But, again, these magistrates issued a second acquittal sentence, which the Appeals Chamber again annulled;

ordering that the trial be repeated with new magistrates.

Although, before this hearing took place, Abderrahmanen Tahiri vanished.

And the new court (made up of judges Ángela Murillo, Jesús Eduardo Gutiérrez and Fermín Javier Echarri Casi) has convicted two of the accused, and acquitted the third.

Subscribe to continue reading

Read without limits

Keep reading

I am already a subscriber

_

Source: elparis

All news articles on 2024-02-13

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.