The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Trump “violated the constitution,” says Republican who wants to make him ineligible

2024-02-21T06:43:13.784Z

Highlights: Norma Anderson, a former Republican elected official, obtained from the Colorado courts the disqualification of Trump for the March 5 primary in that state. At 91, Norma Anderson is well-versed in the U.S. Constitution and keeps copies in her purse and near her television. “Trump should never be president again, because he violated the constitution and tried to overturn an election,” she believes. Since her legal action, Donald Trump's campaign has portrayed her as a "RINO"


Norma Anderson, a former Republican elected official, obtained from the Colorado courts the disqualification of Trump for the March 5 primary in that state. A decision that the former American president is asking the Supreme Court to overturn urgently.


At 91, Norma Anderson is well-versed in the U.S. Constitution: as a lawmaker, she has consulted it often during her long career in the Republican Party, and keeps copies in her purse and near her television.

So on January 6, 2021, when supporters of Donald Trump stormed the Capitol in Washington to try to prevent the transfer of power to Democrat Joe Biden, she dog-eared the page of the 14th Amendment, which provides for the ineligibility of responsible for acts of

“rebellion”

.

“That same evening, I reread this part,”

she says by videoconference, from her home in Colorado (west).

This pure conservative, elected for 20 years under the label of the

“Grand Old Party”

, drew certainty from this.

“Trump should never be president again, because he violated the constitution and tried to overturn an election

,” she believes.

“To me, that means our democracy is in danger if he is elected.”

Also read: Joe Biden against Donald Trump: the crazy campaign that is already exhausting the United States

Can Colorado disqualify Trump?

The retiree became the main – and unexpected – plaintiff in a procedure launched by an association, which pushed the Colorado courts to order the removal of Donald Trump from the ballots in the state.

A decision strongly contested by the ex-president, who is asking the Supreme Court to have it annulled as a matter of urgency, before the Colorado primary organized on March 5 to choose the Republican candidate for the White House.

Scrutinized by other states and potentially explosive, this file was examined at the beginning of February by the highest court in the country, which should decide the question in the coming days or weeks.

During the hearing, the judges appeared skeptical of this unprecedented procedure, based on a provision that had largely been forgotten.

Without discouraging Norma Anderson.

“I am one of those people who always have hope, until we tell them no

,” smiles the former elected official, the first woman to become leader of the Republican elected representatives in the Colorado parliament.

Also read “Sleepy Joe” versus “Dark Brandon”: which Joe Biden should we expect in 2024?

“Our founding fathers would probably put him in jail.”

The 14th Amendment was passed in 1868, after the Civil War, to prevent Southern Confederate officials involved in that Civil War from getting elected.

The text excludes from the highest public functions anyone who has engaged in acts of

“rebellion”

, after having taken an oath before the Constitution.

But the debates before the Supreme Court did not venture into the minefield of what constitutes a rebellion or not, nor into the evaluation of the actions of Donald Trump.

The judges mainly focused their questions on formal objections, appearing to want to avoid any accusations of election interference.

They particularly insisted on a central obstacle: can Colorado decide alone to disqualify a presidential candidate?

“They shouldn't worry about that

,” retorts Norma Anderson, pointing out that in America,

“each state runs elections and approves who is on the ballot.”

In addition to Republican and Democratic contenders, independent candidates sometimes run for president in certain states, without being able to compete throughout the country, she recalls.

“What makes a Republican or a Democrat better than an independent candidate?”

, she asks.

"Nothing.

We should all be treated equally.”

Read also NATO: Europeans in shock at Trump's threats

A “RINO”?

For Norma Anderson, the attitude of Donald Trump, who still falsely maintains that the 2020 election was stolen from him and openly speaks of

“punishment”

in the event of a return to the White House, remains unequivocal.

“Our founding fathers would not be kind to him.

They would probably imprison him

,” she says.

“He likes to be like Putin, or like a king.

(...) His behavior proves it, everything he says proves it.”

Since her legal action, Donald Trump's campaign team has portrayed her as a

"RINO"

, an infamous acronym designating those who are

"Republican in name only"

.

Not enough to raise eyebrows for the nonagenarian, elected from Colorado between 1986 and 2006. She says she focuses on

“congratulations from strangers from all over the country”

, and is sometimes stopped by passers-by for a photo, almost 20 years later his political retirement.

“At the very least, we drew attention to what Donald Trump is

,” she says.

Source: lefigaro

All news articles on 2024-02-21

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.