“The box they attribute to me is much smaller than the one we are going to use when we make the 3 T revolution (land, roof and work)
. ”
Thus, Juan Grabois this Wednesday
rebuked
the scandal over the money spent by the trust fund he managed during the Alberto Fernández government.
"Don't get me into trouble. I'm just going to tell you that he pretends to be superior but explodes with fury," a social leader who saw him in recent days
told Clarín
.
Juan Grabois, in a march in front of Congress.
Photo Juano Tesone
The fund that the Pope's confidant is talking about is the FISU, Urban Social Integration Fund.
Cash, in politics, is money to do politics.
Everyone knows it and so does Grabois, regardless of the fact that she is wearing makeup for another purpose, in this case that of supposedly developing the villas that appear in the Renabap.
Grabois says that the FISU is a "small" box.
According to a report from its own activists, this trust fund spent
1,244 million dollars in the four years of Alberto Fernández and Cristina Kirchner.
A bargain.
Clarín
accessed the complete bulletin that Miño had made.
"At first we made it to upload it to social networks.
We did not realize the scandalous figures that a bankrupt state was paying.
The wave generated by Milei's entry into the runoff, proposing a State more responsible with its expenses, lit a light on us alarm. I think that is why
it was decided to only upload a part of that report to the networks
," says one of the officials of the Secretariat of Socio-Urban Integration who claims to know "in and out" the overbilling of the works that were carried out with the FISU.
Grabois's little box was not an easy thing to put together.
Many of Alberto Fernández's ministers
were intimidated
by the billions of pesos that the FISU had.
$264,267 million, to be exact.
"It is so true that some high officials were scared but others went to war with Grabois
to get their hands on the chest
," they told
Clarín.
They assure that Javier Milei would not be very interested in the Government criminally denouncing those responsible for the FISU, managed by Grabois.
From now on,
María Eugenia Bielsa would have resigned from her position as Minister of Habitat to avoid getting stuck in these issues
.
"We must recognize that we had a government that stole, and a lot," she said publicly later.
There was also a lot of noise (and personal desires) in the efforts of Daniel Arroyo, Juan Zabaleta and Victoria Tolosa Paz.
All
of them were heads of Social Development and Grabois showed his teeth in the street,
with mobilizations of his groups.
At the bottom of these confrontations, pardon the redundancy, was the trust fund
.
"They spent 1,244 green sticks. I understand that in this decomposed Argentina one immorality covers the other. And I'm not talking about the objective, which is to improve the quality of life of the most marginalized
. But about the choreo that was done with that money. They all ate
" , they maintain in the SISU.
A screenshot of the bulletin they made at the Secretariat of Urban Social Integration, which contains the US$ 1,244 million spent by the FISU.
Máximo Kirchner was much more than a national deputy in the power structure of the last Peronist government.
Even in La Cámpora there are those who praised him by calling him "architect."
As he did with Martín Insaurralde, Cristina Kirchner's son was key to creating the FISU
.
That is, to fill it with public resources, since 9% of the Country Tax and also another slice of the Tax on Great Fortunes entered there.
Both tributes were promoted by the still president of the Buenos Aires PJ.
Grabois not only did housing works.
If not, he also invested heavily in the fields,
perhaps a weakness due to his historical confrontation with the rural sector.
The document includes the purchase, in dollars when there were no dollars, of extensive rural plots to develop them and move the inhabitants of deprived neighborhoods there.
It is not known if, despite the investment, any residents of the neglected areas managed to settle in those places.
Works and amounts that according to a report were done with FISU funds.
Javier Milei decided
to eliminate
the FISU "because of the money they made," as he shouted in the media.
It would be of no use without identifying and reporting those responsible.
"The evidence emerges like pesos in the Mint," they say.
Unfortunately, the president would not be too interested in pursuing the culprits.
"Faced with these issues that no one doubts are scandalous, Javier looks at us, shrugs his shoulders, and says that it is a matter of Justice," acknowledges a member of the Cabinet.
The FISU would not be FISU without the BICE
.
Quite a tongue twister.
BICE is the state company (a bank) that Milei wants to privatize.
In the four years of the fourth Kirchnerist government, it was managed by José Ignacio De Mendiguren, Sergio Massa's side.
Someday, perhaps not so late, we will talk about the commissions that were charged and the advisors that were at BICE, men and women who were in charge of receiving the money that Grabois sent them and then transferring it to the accounts of the cooperatives linked to Grabois himself. .
Of course, all audited by militant Grabois "technicians".