This Sunday, former socialist MP Anne-Yvonne Le Dain attracted the wrath of social networks.
The reason ?
A photo of a golden retriever lying comfortably in the center aisle of a train.
The eight-year-old dog, named “Moogly
”
, particularly peaceful, certainly blocked the way, but did not seem threatening, far from it.
However, he brought out the former parliamentarian from Hérault who immediately denounced
“French people who complain, but who accept everything”
.
And to accuse the controllers and travelers of being lax in the face of the
“very large dog”,
she said, who did not have a muzzle, which is a legal obligation in public transport.
But, faced with the good nature of the animal, many Internet users were quite annoyed by the rigor of the former elected official.
The journalist Hugo Clément, known for his defense of the animal cause, did not fail to react, with irony.
“The last time I encountered a golden, he lay on his back to ask me for a pet.
I was paralyzed.
I immediately filed a complaint.”
“Who did I denounce?
A face ?
A name ?
A train and seat number?
who is identifiable?
Your passions are leading you astray
,” the Montpellier woman retorted.
A
“photo taken quietly”
The environmental activist did not stop there and carried out his own investigation by contacting the owner of the dog, which is only partially seen in Anne-Yvonne Le Dain's photograph.
“This gentleman (...) tells me that you did not come to speak to him and that you took the photo surreptitiously, without his consent,”
the
environmentalist
said
.
“He also tells me that he always travels with a muzzle, and that he puts it on as soon as a passenger, afraid of dogs, feels uncomfortable.
Édouard (...) hopes that the very nice and understanding controllers will not be slapped on the wrist because of your denunciation
,” continues Hugo Clément.
Many users of the social network
One of them posted a photo of a golden retriever as majestic as it was friendly, adding the words:
“The face of insecurity in France according to this left-wing MP.”
“Nice”
dogs
responsible for
“70% of bites”
However
,
still
on
_
_
_
In a story from around ten publications, the alleged doctor reveals an applied and didactic argument to demonstrate why
“it is really important”
that a dog
“no matter how nice and gentle it is, must wear a muzzle”
.
He explains that he regularly sees children victims of bites, which
“for 70% of cases” are caused by
“nice”
dogs ,
he notes
.
The user, however, assures
that he “loves”
dogs but is
“also realistic”
.