The Irish vote on Friday March 8 without enthusiasm in a referendum aimed at modernizing the references to women and the family in their Constitution, written in 1937 when the Catholic Church reigned in the country over public and private life.
The first question posed to the Irish concerns the definition of family, and proposes to broaden it beyond that based on marriage, to also include
"lasting relationships"
such as cohabiting couples and their children.
The second question proposes erasing an outdated reference to the role of women in the home, which suggests that they have a duty to care for the other people under their roof.
A new, broader formula would place responsibility on all members of a family for caring for each other.
The two amendments relate to article 41 of the Constitution.
Ireland, a country of 5.3 million inhabitants and member of the European Union, legalized marriage for same-sex couples in 2015 and abortion in 2018.
Polling stations will open at 7 a.m. (8 a.m. in Paris) and close at 10 p.m. (11 p.m. in Paris).
Results are expected late Saturday.
All major political parties are in favor of
"Yes"
and, until recently, polls predicted a fairly easy vote in the referendum, which takes place on March 8, International Women's Day.
But the latest polls have revealed growing uncertainty over the result, particularly due to the imprecision of the questions put to the vote.
In addition, few voters are expected at the polling stations.
“No one knows exactly what a ‘lasting relationship’ is.”
This week, Prime Minister Leo Varadkar, who leads the center-right governing coalition that proposed the referendum, admitted that a
"Yes"
victory was not guaranteed for either motion.
“We see these changes as small steps forward and, overall, we are in favor of a 'Yes' vote
,” Sinn Fein leader Mary, the left-wing nationalist party, said on Thursday. Lou McDonald.
This referendum aims to
“take another step forward for equality”
, defended Orla O'Connor, director of the National Council of Women of Ireland.
But opponents criticize the vague wording in the referendum.
“No one knows exactly what a 'long-lasting relationship' is, while everyone knows exactly what a marriage is
,” criticizes David Quinn, founder of the Iona Institute, a group defending the interests of Catholic community.
Many people will vote "No" because of the confusion
caused and the disappearance of the words
"woman"
and
"mother"
from the text.
Other commentators close to the radical right have raised the specter of polygamous relationships or family reunification of migrants, which they believe could be encouraged.
For political scientist Yvonne Galligan, the second amendment, on care within the family, is the
“more complex”
of the two issues and could be rejected.