The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

The streaming giants eliminate songs from their catalogs with hardly any reproductions

2024-03-11T05:00:19.649Z

Highlights: Streaming giants eliminate songs from their catalogs with hardly any reproductions. In the sea of current music, only the big fish survive. Spotify's new policy: not paying royalties for songs with fewer than 1,000 views in a year. Universal Music and Warner in France have adopted a new model, initially proposed by Deezer, where royalties will only be paid to songs with a minimum of monthly reproductions and by at least 500 different users. In addition, tracks considered “noise” will be eliminated.


In the sea of ​​current music, only the big fish survive.


A curious phenomenon occurs in the vast digital world of music: millions of songs on

streaming

platforms like Spotify remain unplayed.

Recently, the Swedish company and other similar pages are reconsidering their strategies to deal with this excess.

A clear example is the case of several Spanish indie groups that were removed from Spotify and other applications by their digital distributor, Altafonte, due to low reproductions.

The artists found refuge in other distributors that do accept large catalogs with few reproductions.

This change in approach is seen in Spotify's new policy: not paying royalties for songs with fewer than 1,000 views in a year.

A report from Luminate in 2023 revealed that 82.7% of streaming

songs

received less than 1,000 plays and, surprisingly, almost 25% had no plays at all.

With the constant growth of the music catalog, unstreamed songs are predicted to reach 100 million by 2028.

The cost of maintaining these platforms has increased dramatically, from 35 million in 2019 to more than 130 million in 2022. Even though Spotify finally reported profits in the last quarter of 2023, it faced significant challenges, including three rounds of layoffs and a increase in their rates.

However, it remains the leader, with 226 million subscribers and 574 million monthly users.

These changes reflect the pressure on streaming platforms due to high operating costs, investor impatience with technology companies that do not generate consistent profits and competition with companies such as Apple and Amazon, which support their streaming services with other lines of technology. business.

The royalty payment system, known as “pro rata,” benefits the most popular artists, like Taylor Swift, but leaves many others with millions of streams earning just a few dollars a year.

Although Spotify's value has tripled since the pandemic, the proportion of revenue going to artists has not increased significantly.

Traditional record labels, on the other hand, continue to benefit from music rights accumulated over the years, making profits without needing to invest in new talent.

Responding to this panorama, Universal Music and Warner in France have adopted a new model, initially proposed by Deezer, where royalties will only be paid to songs with a minimum of monthly reproductions and by at least 500 different users.

In addition, tracks considered “noise” will be eliminated.

The main challenge for streaming

survival

is how to handle music generated by artificial intelligence and massive catalogs that seek to take advantage of royalties without focusing on quality.

This situation threatens to displace thousands of artists struggling to stand out in a market dominated by algorithms.

Thus,

streaming,

which promised to revolutionize access to music, faces a crucial dilemma: how to balance the offer of an extensive catalog with the need to guarantee fair income for artists and maintain their economic viability.

Meanwhile, music lovers will do well to preserve their vinyl and CD collections, witnesses of a different era in the music industry.

Source: elparis

All news articles on 2024-03-11

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.