The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

After the ruling of the Supreme Court, they already put limits on the updating of interest in compensation

2024-03-12T13:33:45.631Z

Highlights: After the ruling of the Supreme Court, they already put limits on the updating of interest in compensation. The Labor Chamber ordered that the amounts be updated by the Reference Stabilization Coefficient (CER) The country's highest court had annulled a ruling that adjusted the amount by 7,745%. The resolution is the first from labor justice after the Court's ruling weeks ago. The highest court considered that this criterion for calculating dismissal compensation is not provided for in the law and caused in the case a disproportionate increase in the sentence.


The Labor Chamber ordered that the amounts be updated by the Reference Stabilization Coefficient (CER). The country's highest court had annulled a ruling that adjusted the amount by 7,745%.


Days after the ruling of the Supreme Court of Justice that annulled an update of compensation at 7.745% because it was considered "

disproportionate

", the National Chamber of Labor

already sets limits on the adjustments

and ordered them to be tied to the

Reference Stabilization Coefficient (CER)

.

Judges María Dora González and Víctor Pesino resolved a case involving a work accident involving a forestry employee who suffered a blow to the head.

The resolution is the first from labor justice after the Court's ruling weeks ago.

In the ruling, the chamber members pointed out that "if the National Executive Branch ties its debts in pesos to the 'CER' and the Central Bank of the Argentine Republic guarantees the fixed-term deposits tied to the 'CER', nothing prevents the Judicial Branch from

using this same variable to penalize default

."

The Court marked the court weeks ago by annulling a ruling by the National Chamber of Labor that ordered the successive capitalization of interest due to the application of the so-called act 2764/2022.

The highest court considered that this criterion for calculating dismissal compensation is not provided for in the law and caused in the case a disproportionate increase in the sentence that reached 7745.30%.

This act was criticized by several business chambers and some political sectors considered it part of the supposed “labor trial industry.”

The Court, with the signature of Horacio Rosatti, Carlos Rosenkrantz, Juan Carlos Maqueda and Ricardo Lorenzetti, considered the ruling of Chamber IX arbitrary.

News in development.

Source: clarin

All news articles on 2024-03-12

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.