As of: March 13, 2024, 1:08 p.m
Comments
Press
Split
During the continuation of the appeal process regarding the dispute over the classification of the AfD by the Office for the Protection of the Constitution, the AfD's two lawyers, Michael Fengler (l) and Christian Conrad (r), are sitting in the North Rhine-Westphalian Higher Administrative Court in Münster.
© Guido Kirchner/dpa
What strategy is the AfD pursuing in the appeal process against the Office for the Protection of the Constitution?
She shows great interest in the means that the domestic secret service uses to observe her.
Münster - In the appeal process regarding the classification of the AfD as a suspected right-wing extremist case, the party's lawyers tried to elicit details from the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution about its methods of obtaining information.
On Wednesday, the second day of the trial, they also submitted an application to the North Rhine-Westphalia Higher Administrative Court (OVG) in Münster to interrupt the trial and not continue it for another six weeks at the earliest.
The lawyer for the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV), Wolfgang Roth, accused the AfD of submitting applications “in the dark”.
AfD wants to know more about informants
On Wednesday, the topic was, among other things, the use of virtual agents, i.e. employees of the Office for the Protection of the Constitution who use a different identity on social networks, and so-called informants - informants from the party's environment.
The BfV declared on Tuesday evening that “only two of the several thousand pieces of evidence” that had been submitted to the court “contain statements or behavior from human sources of the Office for the Protection of the Constitution.”
The Federal Office also critically examined whether members of state or federal executive boards were appointed as confidants of the Office for the Protection of the Constitution during the processing of the AfD as a suspected case and with regard to its junior organization during the processing of the Junge Alternative as a suspected case and as a proven extremist effort, one of whom was “steering “Influence” could have resulted.
There was no such influence during the relevant period.
The Office for the Protection of the Constitution rules out “external control”.
When asked on Wednesday, the Office for the Protection of the Constitution emphasized that its evidence on the AfD came mainly from speeches and social media posts by elected officials and officials.
It can be ruled out that employees or informants of the Federal Office or the state authorities for the protection of the constitution could have provoked this.
The BfV's lawyer accused the other side of not presenting any evidence that could indicate "external control" or "manipulation" when asking questions about possible influence exerted by informants.
In the appeal process, which began on Tuesday, the 5th Senate is clarifying whether the ruling from the lower court at the Cologne Administrative Court stands.
The BfV, based in Cologne, had classified the party and the youth organization Junge Alternative (JA) as suspected right-wing extremist cases.
The judges in Cologne confirmed this view in 2022.
Since then, the party and the JA have been allowed to be monitored using intelligence means.
The OVG must now clarify whether the assessment is legal according to the Federal Constitutional Protection Act.
The first day of negotiations ended after eleven hours.
It was still unclear until midday whether there would be any decisions on Wednesday.
The day before, the AfD announced that it had prepared more than 200 applications for evidence.
If there is not enough time on the second day of the hearing, the court would have to look for new dates; a continuation on Thursday is out of the question.
My news
Popular hiking trails in Essen that you should know about
Smartphone data from a perpetrator show shocking new insights into Luise's death reading
Luise (12) killed: Freudenberg shocked by wave of hate - families of the perpetrators leave their place of residence
Corona expert sees catastrophic misjudgment when it comes to vaccinations - and misses follow-up reading
Another strike on buses and trains in North Rhine-Westphalia – numerous cities affected read
Unpunished after Luise's death: What is now happening to the perpetrators - read the first details
When it comes to using informants, people are now very cautious and cautious when it comes to parties.
The first of two unsuccessful ban proceedings against the right-wing extremist NPD, which today calls itself Die Heimat, was discontinued in 2003 because of the numerous informants that the Office for the Protection of the Constitution also had in the party's leadership.
When asked by AfD lawyers, the BfV rejected speculation that the Office for the Protection of the Constitution had obtained information about its litigation strategy through its observation of the party.
dpa