As of: April 8, 2024, 12:51 p.m
By: Sebastian Grauvogl
Comments
Press
Split
Green meadow and flood plain: the area between Westerbergstrasse and Tegernseer Weg. © sts
The possibilities for a building request on a neighboring area are still being examined - but if there are any further requests, the building committee will wave it off for now. The reason: risk of flooding.
Schliersee
- If it's going to be a complex flood test, then it should be as comprehensive as possible. This is roughly how an informal request for two properties on Westerbergstrasse could be described, which the Schliersee local council's building committee had to deal with. Because: An application for over-planning for a residential development had already been received for another area in the immediate vicinity, but the local council made this dependent on the result of a statement from the water law department at the district office and therefore postponed it. On top of that, as is well known, the committee could only imagine a development along Tegernseer Weg.
As building authority manager Annika Dietmannsberger explained, the conditions on the properties that have now been added are not really any easier. In terms of building law, the areas are located outside, but in the land use plan they are shown as a commercial area. In fact, it is one of the last undeveloped commercial areas in Schliersee that would be permanently lost if converted into living space. In addition, there is a need for legal protection of the public sewer that runs across one of the properties and possibly an assignment of road property due to the small width of Westerbergstrasse.
But then Dietmannsberger came to the biggest problem - as with the first application: the location of the properties in the water-sensitive area and in the designated flood area, which only makes a building area designation possible if a nine-point list is fulfilled.
Gerhard Waas (Greens) added another problem: the proposed building area would not be connected to another settlement and therefore, according to the specifications of the State Development Program (LEP), has “zero point zero chance of success”. Even the Glockenalm campsite in Aurach in the neighboring municipality of Fischbachau was not allowed to build chalets, but only mobile homes, due to a lack of connections, Waas knew.
Wolfgang Mundel (CSU) asked a fundamental question about the further designation of living space in the Breitenbach area: “How much can our infrastructure still withstand?” The community cannot create endless living space and then “push behind” when it comes to daycare places or traffic development. Considerations that would certainly be made in the course of the re-planning of the former Warnecke & Böhm area were reminded by Deputy Mayor Philipp Krogoll (Die Schlierseer), who chaired the meeting on behalf of Mayor Franz Schnitzenbaumer (CSU). When it comes to connections, Krogoll suspected that the applicants are hoping to be able to demonstrate a sufficient connection to the newly applied areas if the residential buildings on Tegernseer Weg are built.
In the end, the building committee members saw no reason to extend the water law review to the two additional properties. First of all, we should wait for the result of the process that has already started. The informal request was therefore unanimously rejected.