Le Figaro Bordeaux
For the victims' daughters, the theory of an affair between their neighbor and their mother is nothing but a lie. Indicted for the double assassination of Sylvianne and Jean-Claude Muller on the night of December 14 to 15, 2019, David D. nevertheless confessed to a crime of passion while in police custody. A judicial reconstruction, at the scene of the crime, must confront him with his statements on Thursday.
“It is the confrontation of horror with reality, of its version with the judicial reality of concrete elements”
, reacts Maître Arnaud Dupin, the lawyer for the victims' daughters, for whom the hypothesis of this connection is also
“a aberration”
with regard to the file. David D., whose DNA was found under the nails of his alleged lover, is suspected of having taken the lives of the Muller couple with the greatest barbarity. Found by Margaux Muller, the youngest of the couple, the victims had been staged on their marital bed, naked and bathing in their blood. Their autopsies revealed that they had tried to defend themselves and that Sylviane Muller had been raped with an object.
He's going to talk shit, we can't force him to tell the truth. What's the point of seeing my dead parents' crime scene again when I'm already traumatized? It's not a prom
Margaux Muller, youngest daughter of the victims
Lacerated breasts
A rape for which David D., placed in pre-trial detention following his police custody in November, will have to explain. If Sylvianne Muller was his mistress, why did you slash her breasts in addition to this rape? How can we justify that according to several corroborating sources, he searched the internet for keywords aimed at finding out about how to subject a woman to sexual abuse? Why were photos of the Muller couple's daughters found on his digital devices during the investigations when their family was not friends with his?
According to the first elements of the investigation, David D. was going through a period of
“sexual desert”
at the material times. According to a source close to the file at Le
Figaro
, the crime scene reveals clues which suggest the realization of the “fantasy” of an unbalanced person. Psychological and psychiatric expertise, as well as a rogatory commission on his personality, his relationships with his wife and those he has maintained with other women since their divorce, which have not yet been mandated by the investigation according to our information, could help determine this.
“He’s going to say shit”
Entitled to attend this judicial reconstitution, Margaux Muller chose to abstain, unlike her older sister.
“He’s going to talk shit, we can’t force him to tell the truth. What's the point of seeing my dead parents' crime scene again when I'm already traumatized? It’s not an end-of-year ball
,” confides the student to Le
Figaro
. Deeply convinced of the guilt of her neighbor - in her eyes confused by the traces of his DNA under her mother's nails - the young woman judges that
"he is a monster"
.
Presumed innocent until his trial, David D. is still the subject of an investigation procedure which has not yet been completed.