The prosecution will not appeal the file of the case in which the management of the former vice president of the Valencian Government, Mónica Oltra, regarding her ex-husband's abuse of a minor was investigated when the leader of Compromís was also responsible for Inclusive Policies. The accusation caused Oltra to resign not only from her positions in the Valencian Executive but also as a deputy in the regional Cortes.
The judge who has investigated the case for two years decided, just ten days ago, to archive the case considering that there were “no indications of the commission of any crime.” “It has not been proven, not even at the level of the evidence, that Oltra, or any other person from the Department, issued any order, instruction, order or indication” to hide or carry out an extrajudicial investigation into the case of abuse of the ex-husband. of politics, as the accusations claimed.
“It has been reiterated ad nauseam that there is not a single indication that any order or instruction was issued from the management positions of the Ministry aimed at hiding the facts or discrediting the minor,” the judge insisted in the order.
The prosecution has thus decided, according to sources from the institution, not to appeal the decision that has been appealed by the other accusations, the one representing the victim of the abuse, and the one presented by an association led by the former founder of Vox Cristina Seguí and the ultra training itself.
The accusation of Mónica Oltra came after the presentation of the complaints in what the vice president always considered a “political hunt.” Her status as a judge, being a regional parliamentarian, meant that the decision was made in the Superior Court of Justice of the Valencian Community, to which the judge requested the indictment to investigate whether there was a cover-up of the case. The request was then supported by the prosecutor's office, which, in the hands of the then senior prosecutor, Teresa Gisbert, sent a harsh letter in which she considered not only that Oltra had known about the abuses before they were prosecuted but that she issued a verbal order to "distort the credibility of the minor” and hide the facts. “A superficial investigation was carried out, in which a line of concealment of the facts is evidently perceived,” the public ministry then indicated, describing a “willingness to let it go.”
Between that letter and the file, the judge has instructed several proceedings, among which the study of the emails that the Oltra team exchanged in the counseling both with the vice president and with each other stands out. In the more than 45,000 emails, the police did not find any that dealt with the issue of the minor until the Prosecutor's Office informed them that it had opened proceedings. This was maintained in a report sent to the court in which it states that there are only emails referring to the case from August 8, 2017, when the department opened an information file after learning that a judicial investigation was underway and in no case They contain instructions or orders to hide it. The order thus maintains that “each and every one of the indications that at the time supported the provisional judicial accusations against the people investigated have completely vanished.”
What affects the most is what happens closest. So you don't miss anything, subscribe.
Subscribe
_