The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

“Is it time for a killing blow?” : the Israeli press wonders about a response after the Iranian attack

2024-04-14T14:51:54.973Z

Highlights: Many Israeli commentators believe that the Jewish state should respond, while taking the time to strengthen its regional alliances. “Until today, Israel has not succeeded in changing the equation,” writes a journalist from the country's leading daily Yediot Aharonot. The Economist judges that the government has the opportunity to reassure the Arab countries which supported it against the Iranian attack, notably by quickly ending the war in Gaza. Former general in the Israeli army Giora Island estimated that the Iranian regime has kept us in suspense for more than ten days, adding that Israel has the possibility of acting at all at the moment to maintain the valuable nuclear weapons program. It is impossible not to respond to such an attack, writes Maariv, but people should take time to reflect and think about how to respond. The Israeli media are asking questions. How to react? Should we fight back? Or should we consider that the interception of missiles and drones launched by Iran is a victory in itself, as the United States has affirmed.


PRESS REVIEW - The day after the attack by more than 300 Iranian drones and missiles, many Israeli commentators believe that the Jewish state should respond, while taking the time to strengthen its regional alliances.


“Maybe it’s time to change the equation?”

In the wake of Iran's unprecedented attack on Israel, the Israeli media are asking questions. How to react ? Should we fight back? Or should we consider that the

“99%”

interception of missiles and drones launched by Iran is a victory in itself, as the United States has affirmed, which has also made it known that it does not want not enter into conflict with the Islamic regime?

“Until today, Israel has not succeeded in changing the equation

,” notes a journalist from the country's leading daily

Yediot Aharonot

, in a column published this Sunday.

“Iran is threatening. Israel is afraid. Maybe Iran should be scared instead? Perhaps it is time to clarify that even if it is difficult to hit the underground bunkers where the nuclear threat is conceived, it is however possible to deal a fatal blow to the Iranian economy, for example by paralyzing the deposits oil?”,

also writes the journalist. “

A confrontation 10 years ago would have been necessary. A confrontation in 10 years will be much more difficult

,” he writes again.

“Impossible not to answer”

The daily

Maariv,

for its part, underlines in an article on the front page of its site that Israeli planes were

“already on the way”

to retaliate when the American president called his counterpart Benjamin Netanyahu to curb the reaction. "

To all the brawlers [...] who talk about an 'unprecedented' Israeli response and threaten the whole world, you must remember three important points",

warns a journalist from the daily in another article, calling for consideration of the “

historic

” coalition

of the United States, the United Kingdom and Jordan with Israel to intercept the missiles.

The author also recalls that the Jewish state is already engaged in a war in Gaza and that Hezbollah did not participate “

significantly

” in the Iranian attack. “

It is impossible not to respond to such an attack

,” he continues, nevertheless calling for people to take the time to “

reflect

.”

“Will Netanyahu waste the strategic opportunity”

offered to him? In the columns of the left-wing Israeli daily

Haaretz

, the journalist and correspondent for

The Economist

in Israel judges that the government has the opportunity to reassure the Arab countries which supported it against the Iranian attack, and which are "

now de facto allies

”, notably by quickly ending the war in Gaza.

“Strike nuclear sites”

To do this, Netanyahu must “

resist demands for immediate and unbalanced retaliation

”, formulated among others by the most extremist members of the government in place, such as Minister of National Security Itamar Ben-Gvir, who demanded an “

overwhelming

” response.

.

Former general in the Israeli army, Giora Island also estimated, interviewed by the

Channel N12 television channel,

that the Jewish state should not rush. “

Just as the Iranians kept us in suspense for more than ten days, we can also keep them in suspense

,” he said, adding all the same that the country “

has the possibility of not acting at all to the moment

” focusing on “

maintaining the dynamic

” of public opinion around Israel.

What if Israel decides to use this opportunity to finally bomb Iran's valuable nuclear weapons program?

», asks the

Jerusalem Post

, which details in an article the way in which the Israeli army could deploy its combat aviation. “

Several quartets of F-35 stealth fighter jets could fly separate routes to strike sites across the immense Islamic Republic

,” writes the Israeli newspaper, specifying that the fighters could pass through Syria, Turkey and the Iran despite the opposition of these countries. Israel could also have “

a discreet agreement

” with Saudi Arabia to breach its airspace and cross the Persian Gulf.

Iran will pay 'when due'

Israel could also use its ballistic missiles and intelligence and attack drones to first destroy the country's anti-aircraft installations and then its nuclear facilities, even though some are "

buried 80 meters underground

."

Israel will make Iran pay the price for its attack when the time is right, centrist war cabinet minister Benny Gantz said on Sunday. “

We will build a regional coalition and exact a price from Iran in a way and time that suits us

,” he said in a statement after a war cabinet meeting. An Israeli military source also told the

New York Times

that Tel Aviv's response would be given in coordination with its allies.

Source: lefigaro

All news articles on 2024-04-14

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.